A to Zantac: Everything You Should Know About the Zantac Class Action Lawsuit

Good Lawyers | I Need a Lawyer | LaBovick Law Group of West Palm Beach, Florida

A to Zantac: Everything You Should Know About the Zantac Class Action Lawsuit

So far, 42,000 people have sued corporate giant, Bayer, for its glyphosate-containing weed killer, Roundup. That’s because plaintiffs alleged that glyphosate was causing cancer after years of using Bayer’s Roundup product.

Now, another product is coming under fire for potentially having carcinogenic effects. Zantac— the brand name manufacturer of Ranitidine antacid drugs— has been found to contain high amounts of the potentially toxic NDMA.

If you use Zantac or another brand of Ranitidine, you may wonder: am I at risk? If you’ve developed cancer during or after your use of Ranitidine, you may have grounds for a Zantac class-action lawsuit.

Are you wondering if you or your loved one’s antacid medicine is potentially harmful? Searching for advice on what to do about it? Then you need to keep reading because this guide is for you.

What Is Zantac?

Zantac is the brand name of a prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) antacid medicine. You may know it better by its drug name, Ranitidine, or from the drug company that makes it— Sanofi.

Antacids are commonly used in the treatment and prevention of heartburn. It’s what’s known as a histamine-2 (H2) blocker, which also makes this drug perfect for treating and preventing stomach and intestinal ulcers.

In addition to Zantac, other manufacturers that produce prescription and OTC Ranitidine include:

  • Sandoz
  • Apotex
  • Ajanta Pharma
  • Aurobindo Pharma
  • Dr. Reddys Labs
  • Novitium Pharma
  • ACIC Pharms
  • Glenmark Pharms
  • Par Pharm
  • VKT Pharma PVT
  • Wockhardt

In October of 2019, the FDA released a statement regarding the safety of Ranitidine. They revealed that pharmacies had discovered dangerous amounts of the toxin N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA).

What are the Allegations Against Zantac? 

So, what’s the big deal about NDMA? It’s a contaminant found naturally in many edible and drinkable products. That means eating or drinking small amounts of NDMA isn’t a big deal.

However, it’s when humans ingest high amounts of this toxin that regulatory bodies start to worry. Why? The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified it as a probable carcinogen, which means NDMA may cause cancer.

For this reason, the FDA issued out consumer warning letters in September 2019. They warned Ranitidine users of the potentially negative health effects NDMA consumption could cause.

Then, they began researching whether or not Ranitidine might also pose an increased risk of developing cancer. Here’s what the FDA found.

Ranitidine and NDMA

By now you may be wondering: if small amounts of NDMA aren’t harmful, what’s all the fuss? After investigating the association between Ranitidine and NDMA for over six months, the FDA found something surprising.

The trace amounts of NDMA in Ranitidine medications may start off small, but they increase over time. Particularly, if left in above-room temperature conditions, NDMA content got so high, the FDA considered it unacceptable for human consumption.

Even if people store their medications correctly, the process by which Ranitidine is made possibly exposes the drug to these high temperatures. Worse, FDA researchers found that the older the Ranitidine product, the higher the amount of NDMA present.

This is bad news for Ranitidine takers because FDA researchers have found that sustained, high levels of exposure to NDMA could increase a person’s risk for cancer.

Due to all of these findings, the FDA issued a recall notice on April 1, 2020. This notice was effective immediately.

They strongly suggested that manufacturers and retailers should stop producing and distributing prescription and OTC Ranitidine drugs. The FDA also recommended all OTC Ranitidine users to cease use. They said that people prescribed to Ranitidine for health needs should speak to their physician about using alternative treatment methods.

What to Do if You Use Zantac

Do you take Zantac or another Ranitidine medication? If it’s an over-the-counter product (e.g., one you buy at a superstore without a prescription), you should get rid of it immediately. The FDA recommends switching to one of the many OTC products for heartburn that don’t contain NDMA.

For prescription Ranitidine users, the situation is a bit more complex. You can’t cease the use of your medication immediately. Instead, the FDA recommends that your health care provider look into switching you to a non-NDMA containing medication such as:

  • Famotidine (brand name: Pepcid)
  • Cimetidine (brand name: Tagamet)
  • Esomeprazole (brand name: Nexium)
  • Lansoprazole (brand name: Prevacid)
  • Omeprazole (brand name: Prilosec)

Once you stop using the drug, you’ll no longer risk ingesting unacceptable levels of NDMA contaminants. However, you may still experience health complications due to your long-term Ranitidine use.

Zantac and Cancer

Even if you cease use of your Ranitidine-containing antacids, you may find out (or may have already found out) that you have cancer.

You don’t have to suffer while big drug companies get away with manufacturing and selling potentially harmful medications. Instead, you can call a personal injury attorney.

An attorney can help you file a Zantac class-action lawsuit. Personal injury lawyers have taken down big companies for marketing carcinogenic products before. This time is no different.

File a Zantac Class Action Lawsuit and Win Your Case

Do you take Zantac or another Ranitidine medication? Have you recently been diagnosed with cancer? You aren’t alone because the FDA has found that Ranitidine-containing products expose consumers to harmful levels of the toxin NDMA.

That’s why you need to contact one of the personal injury lawyers at LaBovick Law Group.

Think you’re suffering from cancer due to taking Ranitidine antacids? Get in touch with LaBovick Law Group today and find out how we can help you win your Zantac class-action lawsuit.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.