Can I go back to work and remain eligible for Social Security Disability?

SSD 15

The process of obtaining Social Security Disability benefits is typically incredibly slow. It can take several months or even years to obtain approval. If you are waiting for your claim to be approved, you are probably worried about how you are going to be able to sustain yourself financially during this process. Some people may want to know if they can return to the workforce and still remain eligible for disability benefits.

First, it is important to understand the Social Security Administration’s definition of “disabled.” To be considered disabled according to Social Security, you must have a condition that has lasted or is expected to last for at least 12 months or result in death that has prevented you from engaging in substantial gainful activity. “Substantial gainful activity” is used by Social Security to describe a level of work activity. This is work activity that results in gross pay that exceeds the guidelines that Social Security publishes on an annual basis. For example, in 2022, “substantial gainful activity” is defined as gross income per month of $1350 or more. Note that gross income is income before taxes or other deductions are not applied – not just take-home pay. This also includes tips and other earnings, not simply hourly wages. Note as well that whether one is engaged in substantial gainful activity is NOT based on the number of hours per week one works. You can work part-time yet still have earnings that exceed substantial gainful activity levels. Social Security only looks at the amount of money that you have earned. Therefore, you need to have a period of at least twelve months where you are earning less than substantial gainful activity levels because of your medical condition.

Social Security’s rules do not actually require you to have completely stopped working in order to be eligible for disability benefits. You can still continue to work on a part-time basis, provided that your earnings do not exceed substantial gainful activity levels. However, it is important to keep in mind that the examiner may want to know how you are able to work at all, even on a part-time basis, with your disability. This is particularly true if you are working a job that requires a lot of standing or lifting. It is important to consult with an Social Security Disability Lawyer in this situation and receive guidance on the best way to present this information to Social Security. The team at LaBovick Law Group has a wealth of experience with this situation and is prepared to assist you.

If you have completely stopped working but are still waiting for approval and have concerns about finances, you may be wondering whether you can go back to work and remain eligible for Social Security Disability benefits. To remain eligible for benefits on an indefinite basis, the rules described above related to substantial gainful activity levels will apply. If your income remains under substantial gainful activity levels, your eligibility for disability benefits will not be affected. Again, though, remember that Social Security may want to know how you are able to perform even part-time work with your conditions. It is important to discuss with an attorney how to best present your case to Social Security.

If you plan on returning to work and are earning more than substantial gainful activity levels, it is possible to remain eligible for benefits for a period of time. If you have returned to work but are unable to continue working because of your conditions, or have to reduce your work to a point that you are no longer earning substantial gainful activity level income, then your return to work will be considered an “unsuccessful work attempt” by Social Security. Note that this period of time where you returned to work must not exceed six months. Your unsuccessful work attempt period will not prevent you from remaining eligible for Social Security Disability benefits. Social Security requires that there be a significant break in the continuity of a person’s work before the person is considered to have begun a work attempt that later became unsuccessful. The reason you stopped working must be related to your impairment – Social Security requires that there must have been frequent absences due to your impairment, or the work must have been unsatisfactory due to your impairment, or the work must have been done during a period of temporary remission of your impairment, or the work was done under special conditions. The “special conditions” component is very important and can be very helpful for your case if you have returned to work. Often, when people who are awaiting approval for their disability benefits go back to work, they return to work for employers who knew them before or go to work for family or friends who understand their condition. Therefore, they may be permitted to engage in certain activities that would not ordinarily be permissible to employers, such as taking extra breaks, working an irregular schedule, working at a lower level of productivity than the normal standard, getting help from other employees in performing certain aspects of the job that they are unable to do themselves, or are accommodated in some other manner that is not standard for the position. If you have returned to work for an employer who is accommodating your disability and medical needs (including letting you miss work frequently for doctor’s appointments), ask your employer or human resources department to write a letter for you listing the accommodations that they are providing you. This information can be vitally helpful to your case in proving to Social Security that you are not returning to work on a normal basis and that you are receiving substantial accommodation to be able to perform the job at all.

Navigating Social Security’s rules for returning to work and remaining eligible for disability benefits can be extremely difficult. Call LaBovick Law Group at (561) 625-8307 for a free case evaluation. Our expert legal team is ready to assist you with winning your case.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.