Can I Receive Social Security Disability Benefits for Limited or Blurry Vision?

Can I Receive Social Security Disability Benefits for Limited or Blurry Vision?

Applying for social security disability based upon impaired vision is generally an uphill battle. You may be entitled to Social Security disability benefits depending on whether you meet the definition of “disability” under the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) rules and regulations.  If you are deemed statutorily blind, you would be considered disabled and entitled to benefits.  However, in order to get benefits based on statutory blindness, you must have 20/200, or less, vision after best correction in the better eye. (Listing 2.02). If you have conditions such as cataracts or retinopathy, there is no automatic approval. Your ability to qualify for Social Security disability benefits will depend on your loss of visual acuity based on visual tests.  It is thus very important that you get tested by your ophthalmologist at the earliest opportunity so that you can demonstrate disability as of the earliest date.

The 5-Step Disability Analysis

There is a five-step process or analysis that the SSA uses to evaluate each claim and determine if you are disabled.  In general, to meet the definition of disability you must be unable to engage in the substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.

  1. In the first step, SSA looks at whether or not you are working. If you are working, you must not be engaging in substantial gainful activity. In the year 2020, substantial gainful activity is defined as earning over $1,260 a month.  If you have no earnings or are earning under that amount, then you move on to step two.
  2. In step two of the process, you must show that your impairment or impairments are severe. To be severe, your impairment(s) must have more than a minimal impact on your ability to engage in basic work activity. 
  3. In step three of the process, it is determined whether your condition meets the criteria of a listing. Social Security created a list of conditions referred to as the “listings”.  If you meet the criteria of a listed condition; you will be considered disabled automatically. You will automatically qualify for benefits if you meet the criteria for the listings for statutory blindness, 2.02, 2.03A and B.  In other words, you must have a loss of vision in your visual fields or loss of visual efficiency or impairment after best correction meeting specific levels of impairment.  The Social Security listings, 2.02, 2.03 contain technical criteria which must be met for automatic qualification.  If you meet a listing, then you will be automatically considered disabled at step three. 
  4. What if you are suffering from blurry vision or have gaps in your field of vision, making it difficult for you to function and work, yet you do not meet the listing for statutory blindness? At step 4 in the process, your residual functional capacity is determined. This is an evaluation of your level of disability as measured by your functional ability to engage in basic work activity considering your impairments.   

Unfortunately, if you do not meet the criteria of one of the listings above, it is usually difficult to be found disabled based upon a limited residual functional capacity, which is solely based upon a visual impairment. Social Security will usually find that there are jobs still available to you, even if you do not have a good vision. Only jobs that require handling of small objects or reading small print would theoretically be eliminated from your base of potential jobs.  There would likely be jobs remaining that you could do handling large objects. Of course, if you can show that your visual impairment causes you to be a hazard to yourself or others; potential jobs will be significantly eroded.

Moreover, if you have a visual impairment along with physical limitations, then it will also be easier to show that there are no jobs that you can do. For example, if your physical limitations, such as back or neck problems, limit you to sedentary work; and your visual impairment prevents you from seeing small objects or reading small print, then sedentary jobs may not be available, and you will be found disabled.  Another example would be if you are blind in one eye and are limited to sedentary jobs due to physical impairments; then even with one good eye your productivity and pace would be significantly diminished doing sedentary jobs.  Sedentary jobs generally require that you be able to see small details and work at a productive pace.

Additionally, if you have other adverse factors which would make it difficult to find work, such as closely approaching retirement age, having a limited education or lacking transferable skills, then having a visual impairment in addition to these factors will significantly reduce the amount of potential jobs out there. Keep in mind that SSA will consider your activities. For example, if you are able to drive and take care of your kids and do other everyday activities without difficulty; then you likely would not be found to have a significant enough visual impairment to be entitled to benefits. The first question that must be answered at step 4 in the process is whether you are able to do any of your past relevant work considering your residual functional capacity.  If you are not deemed able to return to your past relevant work, then you move on to step 5 in the process. 

     5. At step 5 in the process, the last and final step, it is determined whether you can return to any other work within your residual functional capacity, considering your age, education and work experience.  This is the point in the process where it is determined if there are any potential jobs out there that you can do. If there are no other jobs that you can do within your residual functional capacity, then you will be considered disabled.  

Contact LaBovick Law Group’s Social Security Disability Attorneys

If you believe your visual impairment prevents you from working, applying for social security disability is likely the right choice for you.  At the LaBovick Law Group, we provide free consultations where we will review the facts of your case to determine if this is the right program for you.  Call us today at (561) 623-3681 for your free evaluation.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.