Comparative Negligence vs. Contributory Negligence

What is the difference between a comparative negligence state like Florida and a contributory negligence state?  Well, I can say right off the bat, comparative negligence as a legal method is far fairer for the injured victim.
In a comparative negligence system, both parties can argue about the percentage of fault of each party.  No one must be 100% at fault and each can argue for what they believe is a fair division of fault.  In the final outcome, a jury determines how to split up the total fault between the parties.
Imagine an automobile accident between two parties.  Plaintiff is going west down Main Street.  The Defendant is going North on Elm Street.  At the intersection, they collide.  The Plaintiff believes her light was green. The Defendant says his light was yellow and the Plaintiff jumped out into the intersection too early.  A jury can listen to all the evidence and split up the fault any way they want. Maybe they find the Plaintiff 30% at fault and the Defendant 70%.  Or vice-versa.
The jury also determines how much damage the Plaintiff suffered. There is a lot that goes into determining a proper and complete damage award.  Pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, disfigurement, loss of income, medical bills.  It’s a big topic for another blog post.  Let’s just set the jury award at an easy to split up $1,000,000.00.
If the liability split is 30% on the Plaintiff and 70% on the Defendant, and the damages awarded are $1 million dollars,  then the Verdict will be for the Plaintiff in the amount of $700,000.  If the jury found the Plaintiff 70% at fault then the total award would only be $300,000.  These percentages can go all the way to 99% vs. 1%.  And vice-versa.  You simply adjust the award of damages according to the percentage of fault.
Maybe it seems unfair to the Plaintiff to reduce their award when they are not significantly at fault compared to the Defendant.  But it is a super fair system when you compare it to the alternative.
Some states keep the old Contributory negligence defense. In that legal theory, the Plaintiff is not entitled to ANY damages unless they are 100% NOT AT FAULT!   If the jury finds the Plaintiff at fault then it’s over!  No lawsuit!  This is an extremely harsh and unfair system of justice.
Luckily Florida keeps the Comparative Fault system in place to protect its people from unfair and harsh outcomes.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.