Drone Laws in Florida

Honestly I am starting to feel both old and scared.  It is almost like I am a guy who was raised on a farm and horses were the only fast transportation. Then, within a short period of time, man was riding in trains, then cars, then a few years later, planes.  Imagine the shock and awe of a plane trip in 1919.  But I was born in the age of planes, trains and automobiles.  So why do I feel so antiquated?  Because of Drones, Tesla self-driving cars, the miracle of the iPhone, and Alexa.  There is this huge push into Star Trek futuristic technology that seems incredible.  As much as I like it, I also see the dangerous nature of it all.  I understand Elon Musk’s obsessive fear of artificial intelligence.

As a personal injury lawyer I am making some bets on the future as well.  The first one is that automobiles are going to get in far fewer accidents.  We have three cars in my family.   Two of them beep and try to stop before a rear-end collision occurs.  I think it will be a long time before the human error is fully out of the driving equation, but clearly, there are going to be a lot less low-impact bump type accidents.

The other bet is that the rise of Drones is coming FAST!  The FAA is predicting that there will be more than 300,000 drones in the sky by 2020.  I am betting they are wrong.  I believe there will be literally millions.  Maybe just at a million by 2020 but soon after millions.  They will be used for commercial and business purposes. They will be used for entertainment. They will be used for private use, like delivering some milk to a neighbor down the block, walking your dog, and checking if the mail has come yet.  There are a lot of things Drones will be used for, and the upcoming question is what can you do legally with a drone and what rights do we have to stop drones from invading our lives.  There are some State laws that are already on the books.  Florida has started to broach this hard question.  The first question Florida attacked was the one facing Floridians right now:  Invasion of personal space and privacy.

I believe it is a good place to start.  I was at an outdoor yoga class a few weeks back.  It is set in the idyllic setting under a giant Banyan tree, under the Jupiter Lighthouse, right on the ocean cut between the Loxahatchee River and the ocean.  It is one of the most beautiful public settings you could imagine, especially for yoga.  It is shaded from the sun, overlooks some outdoor restaurants across the Intracostal waterway and has the most beautiful wooden deck in the world.  Peaceful is the word that comes to mind.  However, peaceful it was not once someone across the water sent their drone to buss over, come underneath the giant shade of the Banyan and film us doing Yoga.  Why anyone would want to see me do yoga is baffling and likely not pretty.  However, that is NOT the point.  The point is that it felt that should be violating my right to privacy.   It is not, by the way, illegal to do. The law is not clear enough in Florida to stop the behavior.  So beware!  Doing yoga in a public forum subjects you to drone filmography.

In 2013 Florida had some laws on the books that made it unlawful to take pictures or film people or property using a drone without their express permission.  That sounded pretty good to me at that time.  But the drone filming privacy law was amended in 2015.  Now the law limits film or photos only if you can identify a person, where they were, and what they were doing at that time.  Which may sound like a good limitation, but think about it:  How do you know if the drone photos or film can actually make you out?  In other words, how do you ever actually know without capturing that drone and looking at the data (film or photo data that is).  In other words, the law is nice but can NOT be enforced. The truth is that a camera of iPhone clarity (most drone cameras are at least as good as a cell phone camera, and most are far better!) will or should be violating the law.  They can capture tiny details in photos and capture human images from far distances, but if you can’t stop the filming as illegal, because it is assumed you are not doing illegal filming when you are using the drone, then you will never know. Of course, later on, when you pop up on some awful website doing downward dog with your pot belly sticking out of your torn tee shirt above your yoga pants which are tighter than you’d like by about 10 lbs – well then you are not going to be happy and the perpetrator will be long gone and uncatchable!

The law in Florida needs to stiffen up. We need a Florida state drone operator license.  All drones should have a clearly marked identification number, just like cars and boats and planes.  This way a drone operator and a drone machine can be traced and the data can be followed.  This isn’t a full proof way to stop the invasion of privacy, but it is a good start.

Further, what about a private right of action against Drone operators who allow their drone to be used in ways that hurt people, including invasion of privacy.

Funny aside:  The other day in jury selection Peter Hunt, a lawyer in the firm, was talking about “risky” behavior and asking jurors if people who engage in risky behavior were 100% at risk or if there were factors that could alleviate their level of responsibility.  One juror said the following:  “So, like, if you are cliff diving, which is dangerous, you are going to have to live with the consequences if you mistime it.  But if you are diving and a drone hits you in mid-air and then you get hurt, well then, that is a whole other story!”

People have droned on the brain!  I can see a future niche market in drone liability.  I can see a future market in drone lawsuits. I can see that Florida courts could get inundated by in Drone related lawsuits.  This is especially true for the invasion of privacy markets.  Regardless, this is the law in Florida right now and if a drone runs into you while you are cliff diving, race car driving or doing yoga, you are welcome to call our office for a free consultation!

Enjoy and have a technology-free day!

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.