Florida Workers’ Compensation Legislation Update from Tallahassee

As everyone involved in Workers’ Compensation knows last the last 18 months have been a wild ride.  The Supreme Court of Florida struck down the attorney fee limitations for claimants (injured workers) so there is now a right to hire a lawyer to help if you are hurt at work.  We have been practicing Workers’ compensation for a long time and this was a much-needed change in the law.  We are far better able to help injured victims now.

However, the business community is up in arms. Workers’ Compensation Insurance Carriers were ready to raise their Work Comp premiums before the first new attorney claim was even filed. Now the legislature is working on new workers’ compensation reform measures and there are two competing bills.

The first bill is a great bill that was introduced in the Florida State Senate by Sen. Rob Bradley under the name SB 1582.  It is a fair compromise between the victim’s right to hire a lawyer and the insurance companies desire to limit inflated claims.  It limits the attorney fees to a reasonable hourly rate of $250, (which is ¼ of what a highly paid attorney could charge) and allows the conservative Work Comp Judges to limit the number of hours.  That way no awards will be out of line.  This is a fair compromise because it allows the victim to get a good lawyer but won’t reward lawyers who try to take advantage of the system.  On the whole, this is the fair and balanced bill.

Then there is the Florida House of Representative Bill. The House committee passed that House Bill (HB 7085) by a vote of 20-9 so it will go to the Florida Senate for review.  That bill seeks to give 100% of the control back to the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Companies and limit all benefits and rights so that injured workers must take what they are given and live with the minimum benefits.

The lawyers in this firm are proud members of the Florida Justice Association (FJA).  FJA set out four pillars for insurance reform to take on which are critical for balanced workers’ compensation reforms.  They are:

  1. Develop a transparent rate-making process that allows for meaningful competition.
  2. Permit an element of patient choice of physician in medical care.
  3. Develop a mid-level tier for providing benefits once the doctor determines the employee has reached Maximum Medical Improvement.
  4. Ensure that injured workers have proper access to the court by maintaining a reasonable standard for attorneys’ fees.

The goal of Workers’ Compensation is to give the injured worker the necessary treatment and help they need to recover and return to work.

The House bill not only attempts to take away the victim’s right to get attorney representation or pay any attorney fees, even though the employer/carrier always has the capacity to hire lawyers to fight unrepresented injured people. The committee declined to give injured workers any opportunity to get a second opinion so the victim can’t check whether the doctor they were assigned, and who was hired by the Workers’ Compensation Insurance carrier to treat the injured person, wasn’t minimizing the injury!   The committee also failed to put any provision in their bill to force carriers to take advantage of free-market principles so competition would drive down rate making.  All in all this bill looks and feels like a law any smart insurance company would want to write.  A law that forces businesses to pay high premiums for coverage that won’t ever need to make any significant payments to injured people.

As the law stands today I would say it is already pro-employer.  When I was a young attorney the workers’ compensation legislation did far more for injured workers than it does now.  Far far more.  But today we have laws which are designed to protect insurance companies and big businesses. Did you know that when a worker is hurt on the job, that worker does not get a choice of which doctor they want to see?  His workers’ compensation insurance company dictates which doctor to see and what medical treatment that worker will get.  That is why a second opinion is such an important part of the Senate bill.  There needs to be some counterbalance.  Also, the insurance company has a fleet of attorneys to defend them.  The injured worker can’t afford his house payments on the meager worker’s compensation out of work wage benefits.  How can they ever hire a lawyer without some rights to recoup the fees if they win?

At this point, both bills are a toss-up.  Who knows what will happen in the Florida legislature?  Both have strong support but on different sides of the aisle.  Maybe we will see the legislature combine them into one solid bill.  Hopefully, they will take the victim’s rights into account and not just pass another law to protect insurance companies.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.