Demystifying Force-Placed Insurance: Protecting Your Home and Rights

Force-Placed Insurance | LaBovick Law Group

In the realm of homeownership, your house embodies security and comfort. However, for lenders, your home represents risk and investment protection. This perspective can lead to a situation known as force-placed insurance. In this comprehensive guide, we will delve deep into the intricacies of force-placed insurance, answering questions such as “What is force-placed insurance?” and exploring its implications for homeowners and their finances.

Understanding Force-Placed Insurance

Force-placed insurance, also referred to as creditor-placed or lender-placed insurance, is a unique insurance arrangement that can significantly impact homeowners. When mortgage lenders extend loans, they’re concerned about safeguarding their investments. To mitigate risk, they require borrowers to maintain a homeowner’s insurance policy. This policy serves as a safety net in case of unforeseen events, such as fires, floods, or other damages.

Force-Placed Insurance vs. Standard Homeowners Insurance

It’s essential to distinguish between force-placed insurance and regular homeowners’ insurance. While both serve to protect your home, they operate differently and have distinct characteristics.

Standard homeowners’ insurance typically covers:

  • Your dwelling
  • Structures on the property (e.g., sheds, pool houses, garages)
  • Personal belongings (e.g., clothing, electronics, furnishings)
  • Liability for injuries and damage to others
  • The cost of temporary relocation

Approximately 95 percent of homeowners choose to carry this insurance, even if their mortgages are paid off. It offers peace of mind and financial protection.

However, force-placed insurance takes control away from homeowners. If your lender believes you’re not meeting their insurance requirements, they can purchase a policy on your behalf, and you’ll be responsible for the cost.

The Force-Placed Scenario

Let’s illustrate this with an example. Suppose your insurance provider offers a policy covering only the structures on your property, with coverage of $250,000. However, your mortgage company deems this insufficient and requires coverage for the mortgage amount, let’s say $350,000. You fall short by $100,000.

In response, your mortgage lender procures a policy to cover the additional $100,000, and they add the premium to your monthly mortgage payment.

At first glance, this may seem reasonable, as you now have the necessary coverage. But is it truly adequate, and what’s the cost?

Pitfalls of Force-Placed Insurance

Force-placed insurance typically offers less comprehensive coverage compared to regular homeowners’ insurance. In many cases, it covers only the dwelling itself. This means that if other structures on your property are damaged or if someone is injured on your premises, you may find yourself without protection, potentially leading to substantial financial losses.

Moreover, the premiums for force-placed insurance can be five to ten times higher than those of standard homeowners’ insurance. Let’s use a hypothetical scenario to illustrate this: if your regular mortgage payment is $2,000, and your homeowner’s insurance costs $500 (assuming it’s not escrowed), you pay a total of $2,500 per month.

However, if your lender insists on force-placed insurance, your monthly payment could surge to around $3,500, requiring an additional $1,000 per month from your budget. Can you afford this sudden increase?

Who Benefits from Force-Placed Insurance?

It’s crucial to understand that force-placed insurance primarily benefits your lender, not you. Lenders are profit-driven entities, and their primary concern is safeguarding their investments and maximizing their revenue. The fees associated with force-placed insurance can be exorbitantly high, especially given the limited coverage it offers. It can feel as though your lender is taking advantage of you.

Legal Actions Against Force-Placed Insurance

The predatory nature of force-placed insurance has not gone unnoticed. In 2015, nearly 400,000 homeowners initiated a class-action lawsuit against Ocwen, a major mortgage lender, and Assurant, a national insurance company. They alleged that Ocwen inflated insurance costs and received substantial kickbacks from Assurant.

These homeowners contended that Ocwen and Assurant had established an immensely profitable scheme, generating hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Ultimately, the insurance and mortgage companies settled, agreeing to pay over $140 million in relief.

This lawsuit is just one example of many legal actions involving force-placed insurance. It underscores the need for vigilance and the potential predatory nature of this insurance practice.

Protecting Your Rights

If your lender proposes force-placed insurance, they are required to provide you with timely notice. Federal law mandates that after the initial notification, lenders must send a second notice at least 30 days later. You then have 15 days to demonstrate that you possess insurance that meets their standards.

Taking Action When Faced with Force-Placed Insurance

In the notice, the lender must clarify:

  • The requirement for insurance on your dwelling as per your mortgage agreement.
  • Your lack of proof for the necessary coverage.
  • How you can provide proof of coverage (the lender must provide instructions).
  • The potential implementation of force-placed insurance if you fail to provide adequate coverage proof.

If you receive such a notice, take immediate action. Contact your insurance agent and furnish them with a copy of the letter. Ensure that your coverage meets the lender’s requirements and persist until your insurer resolves the issue.

Send proof of coverage to your lender. If it complies with their standards, they must cancel the force-placed insurance policy.

However, if you suspect any unethical practices or collusion between the lender and insurance companies, seek legal counsel promptly. An experienced Personal Injury Attorney can help you navigate this complex terrain, protecting your home and your rights.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is force-placed insurance, and how does it differ from regular homeowners insurance?

Force-placed insurance is a policy purchased by lenders on behalf of homeowners who do not meet their insurance requirements. Unlike regular homeowners insurance, it often offers less comprehensive coverage and comes with significantly higher premiums.

Can I dispute the cost or necessity of force-placed insurance imposed by my lender?

Yes, you can dispute force-placed insurance imposed by your lender. Federal law requires lenders to provide notice and allow you to provide proof of insurance that meets their standards. If you believe the insurance is unfairly expensive or unnecessary, consult with legal counsel to protect your rights.

What legal actions have been taken against force-placed insurance practices?

Several legal actions, including class-action lawsuits, have been initiated against force-placed insurance practices. One notable case involved homeowners alleging that a major mortgage lender inflated insurance costs and received kickbacks from an insurance company, resulting in a settlement of over $140 million.

How can an attorney help if I encounter force-placed insurance issues?

An experienced attorney can assist you in navigating force-placed insurance complexities. They can help you dispute unfair insurance costs, protect your rights, and ensure that your home remains adequately insured. If you suspect unethical practices, collusion, or predatory behavior, legal counsel is essential to safeguard your interests.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.