How do I pick my Alleged Onset Date?

Free SSD Case Evaluation | LaBovick Law Group

Often when filling out an application for Social Security Disability benefits, people are unsure what to write down when asked to indicate the date they became disabled. This can be challenging especially when someone has suffered from a health condition for a long time, including while the person was still working. To understand what date of disability, referred to by Social Security as the “alleged onset date,” to select, it is helpful to have a good overall understanding of the Social Security Disability program and its associated rules.

What is the Social Security Disability program?

The Social Security Administration administers two programs which provide benefits based on disability.

  1. The Social Security Disability program (SSDI) provides payment for disability benefits for people who have worked and paid taxes on their income for at least five of the past ten years. SSDI is considered to be an insurance program, and people who qualify for SSDI are considered to be insured based upon their contributions to the Social Security trust fund through Social Security taxes they have paid on their earnings.
  2. Supplemental Security Income, or SSI. This is a program which provides payments to people who are considered disabled and have limited income and resources. This income limit is very strict and may also consider the income of the person’s spouse or others in the household. Other sources of income, such as food stamps, may reduce the monthly amount that one is provided if they are found to be disabled and entitled to benefits.

How does Social Security define disability?

The Social Security Act, which is the law which establishes and addresses the Social Security Disability program, defines disability in adults as the inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity due to any medically determinable impairment or mental impairment which lasts or is expected to last for a continuous period of at least six months or result in death.

What is Social Security’s process for evaluating disability?

Social Security follows a five step process when evaluating a person’s eligibility for disability benefits, known as the “sequential evaluation process.”

First, Social Security will confirm that the person is no longer engaging in substantial gainful activity, which means they are not working more than Social Security’s allowed amount. This is determined by the amount of money a person is earning through work activity per month and not by the number of hours worked. The “substantial gainful activity” level is based on a person’s gross pay, not take home pay. This amount changes on an annual basis. In the year 2023, a person can earn up to $1450 per month in gross earnings and remain eligible to receive Social Security Disability benefits.

Second, the Social Security Administration will determine whether the person has a severe impairment. A severe medically determinable impairment is determined based on the medical evidence within the file.

Medical evidence is comprised of any medical records documenting treatment, examination findings, diagnostic testing such as imaging reports and laboratory testing, operative reports, or other hospitalization records.

Based on those medical records, the Social Security Administration will determine whether the person qualifies under one of Social Security’s listings of impairments. If not, Social Security will evaluate the person’s residual functional capacity.

Residual functional capacity is the person’s ability in light of his or her impairments to do certain activities that may be required in a work setting. These activities include standing, sitting, lifting, walking, reaching, crawling, kneeling, stooping, and using the hands for fine and gross manipulation. If the person has mental conditions, the residual functional capacity will include the ability to perform certain mental tasks such as maintaining attention and concentration, understanding and remembering simple and detailed instructions, and interacting with other people such as coworkers, supervisors, and the public.

After the residual functional capacity is assessed, Social Security will determine in light of these limitations whether the person is able to perform his or her past work. If he or she is unable to perform the past work, Social Security will determine whether there is other work that the person can perform with the limitations Social Security found.

If the case is evaluated at a hearing with an Administrative Law Judge, there may be a vocational expert present who may assess the availability of other jobs in the national economy. If the person cannot perform any other work, he or she will be found disabled.

In light of this information, how do I select an Alleged Onset Date?

If you have applied for SSDI benefits, you will have to prove to Social Security that you became disabled before your “date last insured” expired, if it has in fact expired. You can find out your date of last insured from the Social Security website or by calling Social Security. Once you obtain that date, you will need to pick a date prior to that to prove that you were still insured when you developed your condition.

You also cannot be engaged in substantial gainful activity after that date. Therefore, you need to pick a date after you stopped working, or after you have reduced your work activity to minimal earnings. The definition of disabled indicates the inability to perform normal work activity due to the condition, so even if your condition has lasted for years, it needs to have worsened to a point that you are no longer able to work.

Last, you must have medical records to support that date. If you were experiencing symptoms but not receiving treatment, you would not pick the date you first developed symptoms. Rather, you would choose the date when you began getting treatment for the condition or were diagnosed with it. Some people will select the date of a serious medical event such as a stroke, accident, or major surgery. Others with an ongoing condition will select the date that they stopped working due to their condition worsening.

Selecting an alleged onset date that will result in a successful claim often is best determined by a professional. The legal team at LaBovick Law Group is here to help. Give us a call at (561) 625-8400 – our team is ready to fight for you to get the benefits you need!

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.