Issued a (6)(B) Request by an Insurance Company?  Here’s how to use it to YOUR Advantage!

USAA

USAA has adopted the (6)(B) request as a means of doing business.  USAA generally requests you send them an EMC report pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 627.736(6)(b) prior to receiving the full $10,000.00 under the respective policy.  Unfortunately, you have to comply with their request. However, there is a great opportunity to earn more money.  USAA will have to pay for the benefits owed to you, for the costs of copying records, sending documents, and for clerical work.  Thus, you will receive double payment for your troubles!

Here’s the kicker, USAA is usually sneaky with their (6)(B) language. You may receive a demand response or a letter indicating bills cannot be paid because USAA has not received a particular document.  However, you may find small print indicating a request was effectuated pursuant to 627.736(6)(b) somewhere nestled below the reimbursement explanation.  If that is the case, you have to comply with what they are requesting.  Contact Labovick immediately, do not delay. The more you delay the more you sit around waiting for a check!

STATE FARM

State Farm is more liberal with these requests.  State Farm usually asks for supplier invoices for durable medical equipment or medical records to support certain treatments.  Unless they specify (6)(B) we recommend you simply send over the requisite information and allow us to demand payment. Without utilizing (6)(B) there is no 10-day waiting period.  We can go ahead and get your check ASAP utilizing our innovative tactics.  Call us immediately!

PROGRESSIVE/GEICO/OTHER INSURERS

Generally, Progressive utilizes (6)(B) requests in the same manner as does USAA.  Other insurers are looking for EMC reports. However, if your office has already added EMC notes into your SOAP Notes/Daily records, YOU absolutely do not need to send anything in addition to those SOAP notes. Progressive may ask for an EMC report, and fail to list (6)(B). Again, the 10-day freeze does not come into play in this situation. (6)(B) language is a must!!!

PROGRESSIVE-LICENSING ISSUES, VERY IMPORTANT

As you may know, the PIP statute was revised in 2012. A new licensing portion of the statute was created.  The statute allows chiropractors, MDs, DO’s, etc. to circumvent the ACHA licensing process (Called “Wholly Owned Entities).  Other providers, i.e. Physical Therapists, have to comply with ACHA licensing guidelines along with additional licenses. Certain insurers are requesting pre-suit records prior to sending out payment.

PROGRESSIVE:

Progressive is likewise utilizing (6)(B) as a harassing tactic for clinic information pre-suit. They’re asking for the following information:

The clinic director is:

  • Who owns the Clinic
  • Who shares in the losses/profits
  • Who is the authorized bank signor
  • Who is mentioned on the lease, etc.

PROGRESSIVE CANNOT DO THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 6(b) discusses the information and facts about an insured patient a PIP insurer is entitled to receive, i.e. a treatment report. Clinic licensing IS NOT contained within the subject matter of (6)(B) and is certainly NOT obtainable by the insurer pre-suit.  While they can receive medical notes, THE INSURER CANNOT PERFORM A FISHING EXPEDITION FOR YOUR INTERNAL BUSINESS RECORDS PRE-SUIT.

See 40 Fla. L. Weekly D1447a SHANDS JACKSONVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, (1st DCA, June 22, 2015).

REMEMBER THE BELOW TO PROPERLY RESPOND TO A (6)(B) REQUEST:

  • You SHOULD NOT, I repeat, SHOULD NOT, attempt to respond to their request UNTIL you speak to our office.
  • You should not attach more than requested.
  • Make sure USAA specifically indicates 627.736(6)(b). If they simply state you failed to include something with your bills, they cannot later argue they utilized a (6)(b) request. Thus, you can send the file our way and we can demand/file a suit.
  • USAA HAS 10 DAYS to respond to your (6)(b) REQUEST response to consider payment.  Meaning10 days from the date they actually receive the documents you provide in response to their request.
  • YOU DO NOT need to send additional paperwork if a specific request is nott made.
  • We cannot file suit until the (6)(B) process has been completed.
  • Do not worry, we have ALL the necessary forms and documents to ensure all costs are covered and benefits are paid appropriately.

WHY YOU SHOULD NOT SEND ANYTHING WITHOUT CALLING US

The insurer may request an EMC report. That same insurer is only citing a $2,500.00 cut-off because they have not received your office’s notes about an EMC.  However, you send the insurer additional notes and treatment was rendered for both the accident and a personal condition.  Now, the insurer cuts off treatment citing the additional medical records as its basis.

The above situation is absolutely avoidable; please, contact us prior to responding.  DO NOT SEND MORE THAN what is required.  Moreover, we can weed out what is not needed to sufficiently comply with the insurer’s request.

WHY LABOVICK

Because we value our clients.  Our litigation tactics ensure expeditious recovery of monies you are owed!  We utilize innovative approaches to answering (6)(B) requests as well as litigating your suits. We offer free audits and we offer free monthly reports.  Our reports are highly detailed as we use our own proprietary software to complete them. Do not delay, call our litigation team to ensure maximum monetary recovery!

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.