If I am out of work due to a work-related injury, do I have to look for work to be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits?

WC1

Under the Florida Workers Compensation Law, benefits are paid based upon disability.  Disability means an “incapacity because of the injury to earn in the same or any other employment the wages which the employer is receiving at the time of the injury”.  Basically, the amount of workers’ compensation benefits will be determined based upon any loss of earnings due to disability.  If there is a return to work post-injury, then benefits will be based upon the difference between pre-injury and post-injury wages. These benefits are called temporary partial disability benefits because they only extend until the injured worker has reached maximum medical improvement.  Maximum medical improvement means that the injured worker is not expected to improve or further recover from the injury. Further, these benefits can only extend to 104 weeks, which is the maximum allowable number of weeks of partial disability benefits under the law. Fl. St. 440.15(4). Also, the injured worker has to be able to earn less than 80% of his or her pre-injury wages to be entitled to any temporary partial disability benefits.  In any event, the injured worker has the burden of showing that any subsequent loss of wages was as a result of the compensable workplace injury.

If an injured worker has the capacity to do at least some work, and has an earning capacity, he or she will be considered temporarily partially disabled, prior to reaching maximum medical improvement. In contrast, inability to do any work, or having no earning capacity, would render one temporarily totally disabled. The question then becomes, if the injured employee has some earning capacity and is able to do some work, even if not at the level that they were working pre-injury, is he or she under an obligation or requirement to look for work?  The answer is “no”.  There is no requirement that an injured worker search for work, but there may be circumstances where it would be a good idea, and even necessary.

There are ways that an employer can suspend temporary partial disability benefits under the statute.   The employer can argue that the worker refused a job offer. An employer may offer modified employment, such as light duty work within the employee’s work restrictions. If an injured worker does not return to work because they believe that the job offered would be too difficult for them, or cause them pain, it is up to the Jude of Compensation Claims, (“JCC”), to determine if the job offered is appropriate and suited for them. If an employee unjustifiably refuses a suitable offer of employment, then benefits can be suspended. That does not mean that there is no way to later re-establish entitlement to benefits. For example, if the employee is later terminated from employment or laid off; then the employee is no longer technically “refusing” employment and may be entitled to compensation at that point.   Moore v. Servicemaster, 19 So.3d 1147 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

Also, if an injured worker is terminated for misconduct, then no temporary partial disability benefits will be payable following such termination.  Fl. St. 440.15(4)(e).  Notably, if an injured worker is terminated from employment for reasons other than misconduct, then the period of time following such termination, while the employee was out of work, would not constitute a period of refusal of employment, and benefits may be awarded. Fardella v. genesis Health, 917 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

It is always the injured worker’s burden to show that any lost wages are causally related to the work-related injury and not for other non-related reasons. So, if an injured worker leaves employment to care for a family member or for other unrelated reasons, then it is up to the JCC  to determine if the subsequent loss of earnings is causally connected to the work-related injury. The JCC needs to make factual determinations as to whether a job was available during the relevant time period and whether the injured worker justifiably refused an offer of employment.  Clarke v. Fla. Dept of Financial Services, 275 So.3d 846 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019). Benefits may be suspended if an employee leaves his or her employment without just cause. In such case, the employer can pay disability benefits based upon the “deemed earnings”, of the employee as if they had still continued to work.

Remember, the injured worker always has the burden of showing that there is a causal connection between the compensable injury and any subsequent loss of income. Once this burden is met; the employer may raise defenses such as that the employee voluntarily limited his earnings, or refused a good job offer, or stopped working for unrelated reasons. However, even if the causal connection becomes severed, the employee can re-establish that connection by, for example, searching for work within his or her restrictions. If the employee can prove that he or she is unable to find other work based upon disability, then that would arguably re-establish a right to benefits.  Of course, an employee could also show causal connection between a work- related injury and subsequent loss of earnings with evidence of medical restrictions confirming disability.  Arnold v. Florida’s Blood Ctrs, 949 So.2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Thus, making a good faith job search for work within one’s restrictions, although not required for benefits, may be warranted in order to establish causation between the workplace injuries and any subsequent loss of earnings.  The burden to demonstrate this causal connection is always on the injured worker.

As demonstrated in this article, an injured worker must establish certain elements of his or her claim before being entitled to workers’ compensation disability benefits, whether temporary or permanent in nature. In response, the employer may raise any of a number of defenses challenging the causal relation between your injury and any loss of wages; and you must be ready to respond.  If you have suffered a work related injury, contact our Workers Comp Lawyer at the LaBovick Law Group to see what benefits you may be entitled to.  We provide free consultations where we will review the facts of your case to determine the right course for you.  Call us today at (561) 625-8400 for your free evaluation.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.