Do I Need a Maritime Attorney for Injuries from a Cruise Ship Excursion?

Cruise Ship Excursion Injury Cases

Cruising is often a great way to get away and relax.  These vacations can be fun for the whole family and offer a chance to see different parts of the world like the Caribbean and the islands within it.  This is accomplished via the cruise line excursion.  The cruise line industry offers these excursions to its passengers as a way for them to get off the ship and experience different countries and adventures.  Passengers are offered the opportunity to do things like parasailing, renting scooters and sightseeing tours.  The cruise line offers these excursions through third-party vendors on the islands and oftentimes receives a percentage of the fee they charge.  For example, if the cruise line recommends a parasailing vendor, they may receive a percentage of the fee charged to the passenger, such as 60% to the vendor and 40% to the cruise line.  While these excursions can be fun and exciting, they can also go horribly wrong and cause injury or even death rendering you in need of a maritime attorney.

A shipowner’s liability to non-maritime persons has been held to not be limited to the confines of the ship.  See Gillmor v. Caribbean Cruise Line. Ltd.  In that case, a passenger on a Royal Caribbean Cruise asked a crew member where he could get a newspaper while the ship was docked in San Juan Puerto Rico.  The crew member directed the man to the pier area where the passenger was robbed and stabbed.  All this happened no further than fifty feet from the ship.  The court held that the vessel owner is liable for damages if a crew member either knew or should have known, that there was a high probability of criminal activity in the area adjacent to the vessel’s moorage and failed to warn the passengers of the danger.

Another cruise excursion that ended terribly for passengers involved a bus accident.  Royal Caribbean hired an open-air bus in St. Thomas to tour the island.  The bus lost control and went down an embankment.  Eleven passengers were transported to the hospital with one being seriously injured.  Shipboard material described the trip as the “best of St. Thomas and Shopping shore excursion.”

In July of 2010, a 14-year-old girl was shot and killed while on an open-air bus.  This case involved a Carnival excursion again on the island of St. Thomas.  The bus in question was driving through an area of the island well known to be dangerous when the bus was caught in the crossfire of rival gangs.  At the time of the excursion, the murder rate on the island was 42 for the year in a population of only 100,000.

Cruising is big business.

According to the Cruise Lines International Association, Inc., it is forecasted that there will be over 21.7 million cruise passengers in 2014.  The 2014 global cruise ship fleet is made up of 410 ships with 467,629 beds.  Despite the recent creation of the Passenger Bill of Rights (the cruise industry’s attempt to emphasize responsiveness and safety), the cruise lines still have very restrictive and industry favorable clauses in their passenger ticket contracts.  These clauses include waiver of class actions, forum selection clauses, and a one-year statute of limitations.

Shipowners owe passengers a duty of reasonable care under the circumstances.  This duty extends to passengers even if they are not on board the vessel at the time of injury.  The duty of reasonable care includes a duty to warn passengers of dangers not apparent and obvious.  Also, this duty to warn extends beyond the port to places where passengers are invited to or reasonably may be expected to visit and includes liability for intervening criminal acts in areas where passengers may go if the acts were foreseeable.   Generally, this standard of reasonable care requires that the cruise line have actual or constructive knowledge of the risk-creating condition.  In the context of excursion cases, actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition is proven through the existence of prior similar incidents, such as prior incidents of crime against passengers while at the port.

Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act

In July of 2010, Congress passed the Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act (CVSSA).  The Act was designed to improve vessel security and safety based upon findings by Congress that “passengers on cruise vessels have an inadequate appreciation of their potential vulnerability to crime while on ocean voyages, and those who may be victimized lack the information they need to understand their legal rights or to know who to contact for help in the immediate aftermath of the crime.”  The CVSSA also requires the reporting of crime statistics on the US Coast Guard website.  However, the Act only requires the cruise lines to report matters that are no longer under investigation by the FBI.  This means that actual crime numbers are vastly underreported.

While 46 USC §30509 prohibits a shipowner from requiring a passenger to release it from liability (by signing a waiver/release) for personal injury or death caused by the negligence of the vessel or its crew or to give up the right to a jury trial, the cruise industry has found a loophole around this.  The statute is only applicable to cruises that include at least one US port.  Therefore, if your cruise does not have a US stop in its itinerary, be careful and read waivers/releases as they may be binding.

Excursion Important Issues to Establish Negligence & Case Jurisdiction

Excursion cases are difficult and complicated. Oftentimes, these excursions are not run by the cruise line themselves and they claim they are not responsible for the acts or omissions of these vendors.  Also, US Courts often lack jurisdiction over these vendors.  One way to achieve jurisdiction over these vendors and the cruise line is to prove the excursion was a joint venture between the two companies.  Another way to properly establish negligence on the cruise line is to focus on some important issues such as:

  1. Did the cruise line properly vet the tour/excursion operator?
  2. Did the cruise line properly monitor the activities of the tour/excursion operator?
  3. Did the cruise line make negligent misrepresentations about the tour/excursion operator?
  4. Did the cruise line warn its passengers of the risks?

Having an experienced maritime attorney that knows how to navigate these complex issues is important in order to get the compensation you deserve for your injuries.  The LaBovick Law Group has a team of attorneys that practice in the areas of maritime and admiralty personal injury.  If you have been injured on an excursion, call us today for a free consultation.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.