Medical Expert Testimony at Social Security Disability Hearings

Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis | Social Security Listings | LaBovick Law Group of Florida

In a Social Security Disability benefit hearing, a medical expert testimony can make a significant impact on the outcome of your case. In this article, we’ll discuss what a medical expert is, their responsibilities, and why a judge may require their testimony. We’ll also cover what to expect when a medical expert testifies and how hiring an attorney can benefit your case.

What is a medical expert?

Social Security defines a medical expert as a qualified medical professional, such as a physician, psychologist, or speech language pathologist, who provides impartial expert opinion evidence that an administrative law judge considers when making a decision about disability. A medical expert must be knowledgeable about Social Security’s rules and regulations and have a thorough understanding of medical evidence in disability cases.

What is a Medical Expert responsible for knowing at a hearing?

A medical expert is expected to provide both a factual and expert opinion of the medical evidence in a case.

Medical experts are required to be familiar with Social Security’s rules. Medical experts must understand Social Security’s definition of a “medically determinable impairment as well as Social Security’s definitions of symptoms and findings.

Further, the medical expert must understand that they must take into account the combined impact of all of a person’s impairments together.

Medical experts are required to have a knowledge of Social Security’s Listing of Impairments, which is a list of conditions with specific criteria that are considered severe enough to prevent an individual from doing any gainful work activity.

A medical expert should be versed in the concept of “residual functional capacity,” which is the type of evidence and physical and mental work related limitations which should be considered.

Why Might a Judge Require a Medical Expert to Testify?

There are some circumstances in which the administrative law judge is required to obtain a medical expert opinion. If your case was appealed successfully and sent back for a new hearing, the Appeals Council or Federal court may require that a medical expert provide their opinion on the case. In this instance, the judge is required to have a medical expert opinion, either at the hearing through testimony or in written form.

Another instance is when the administrative law judge is considering finding that your condition is severe enough that it meets or equals one of Social Security’s conditions on the Listing of Impairments.

In other instances, the administrative law judge may choose to have medical expert testimony at his or her discretion. A judge may want an expert opinion on the usual dosage and effects of drugs and other forms of therapy or assess a person’s failure to follow prescribed treatment.

The judge may need assistance with determining the degree of severity of someone’s physical or mental impairment. The judge may request a medical expert to testify to be able to suggest additional relevant evidence, clarify and explain the evidence, or help resolve any conflict they may see in the evidence. A medical expert may also be able to explain the significance of any testing in the medical records which may not be clear.

Further, a medical expert may be able to answer questions about the origins or course of a disease and how it can affect the person’s ability to engage in work activities. There are some administrative law judges who just choose to request testimony from a medical expert at all of his or her hearings.

If the person has both physical conditions and psychological conditions, the judge will likely ask both a medical doctor and a psychologist to testify regarding the person’s conditions.

What will the medical expert do at the hearing?

Although hearings follow a relatively standard format, every administrative law judge structures his or her hearing slightly differently.

In some instances, the judge will ask the claimant to testify, and then ask the medical expert to testify. Other judges prefer to have the medical expert testify first and then have the claimant testify.

The medical expert will be required to testify under oath. Once sworn in, he or she will be asked what the severe impairments of the case are.

After the severe impairments are named, the judge will ask whether the person meets or equals a listing – that is, whether any of his or her conditions meet the criteria set forth under Social Security’s Listing of Impairments, or if their condition is equal in severity to any of those conditions on the list.

If the doctor states that the person meets or equals a listing, he or she will go through the specific criteria and discuss how those conditions are met. If a person meets or equals a listing, they are automatically found to be disabled if the administrative law judge accepts his or her testimony, and the hearing will conclude at that point.

If the person does not have a condition that meets or equals a listing, then the administrative law judge will ask the medical expert to assess the person’s ability to perform things like standing, walking, sitting, lifting, carrying, kneeling, stooping, reaching with the arms, or use the hands for fine manipulation.

If the person’s conditions are psychological in nature, the judge will ask the medical expert for his or her opinion on the person’s ability to remember simple instructions, maintain concentration, or interact with others.

The medical expert will be able to testify as well as to his or her opinion regarding whether the person would need to be absent or need more breaks than a usual person.

Hiring an attorney is critical when a medical expert is testifying

After the judge questions the doctor, the attorney will be able to question the doctor.

An attorney who is familiar with Social Security’s regulations will be able to correctly identify the proper questions to ask the medical expert and know how to use his or her testimony in a manner which is favorable for your case.

If you are scheduled for a hearing with an administrative law judge, having an experienced attorney gives you the best chance for success with your case.

Give us a call at the LaBovick Law Group at (561) 625-8400. Our team is ready to fight for you to get the benefits you deserve.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.