Medical Providers Are Underpaid By Insurance Companies…Here’s How You Fix It!

Emergency Service Physicians are essential providers in the health care field. Generally, these valued practitioners render emergency treatment, management, and evaluation in the emergency room of our hospitals in Florida. Insurance Companies do not see our trusted emergency physicians in the same light.  These PIP insurance carriers are continually underpaying and incorrectly reimbursing emergency service providers. Labovick Law Group strives to correct the injustices of the past. What injustices? Insurance companies’ failure to reimburse our emergency physicians who in most cases are performing lifesaving procedures or evaluations. Our goal as PIP litigators is to fight the insurance companies to ensure that emergency service providers are reimbursed correctly and to eliminate the industry-wide failure to reimburse correctly and timely. It is truly alarming that our emergency providers are unable to receive their just compensation despite providing such essential and lifesaving treatment and care.

To understand the intricacies of the emergency service provider portion of the PIP statute a quick historical background is necessary, followed by a brief explanation about the battle between reimbursement rates and PIP.

Statute Background

On January 1, 2008, the Florida Legislature enacted a revised PIP statute which created a mandatory reservation of $5,000 of the $10,000 PIP benefit, from which payment must be made for bills submitted within a specified timeframe by a “special class of providers.” Pursuant to Florida Statutes 627.736(4)(c), upon receiving notice of an accident that is potentially covered by personal injury protection benefits, the insurer must reserve $5,000 of PIP benefits for payment to physicians licensed under Chapter 458 or 459… who provide emergency services and care. The amount required to be held in reserve may be used only to pay claims from such physicians until 30 days after the date the insurer receives notice of the accident. §627.736(4)(c).

Explanation of Emergency Service Physicians and PIP

The above statute provisions were designed by the Florida Legislature to protect our emergency service providers. The Legislature adopted our core belief that emergency service providers are essential to the health care system. Florida personal injury protection law treats these physicians as a “special class” of providers. $5000 of the $10,000.00 of PIP in Florida is reserved to pay the claims of emergency service providers for 30 days. This ensures that emergency service providers are reimbursed for their important medical services and care. “Emergency services and care” means medical screening, examination, and evaluation by a physician, or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, by another appropriate person under the supervision of a physician, to determine if an emergency medical condition exists and, if it does, the care, treatment, or surgery by a physician necessary to relieve or eliminate the emergency medical condition, within the service capability of the facility. See Florida Statutes 395.002(10).

Incorrect Reimbursements

The reasonableness of the charges is the main component of PIP litigation in Florida. Insurance Companies deny payment to medical providers alleging that their charges for medical treatment are too high. Providers can prove that their charges are reasonable by utilizing PIP litigation attorneys who hire expert witnesses and prepare Motions to assert the “reasonableness of the charges.” However, insurance carriers have been paying/reimbursing emergency service providers incorrectly on a historical basis without penalty.

The “new” PIP statute that was applied to Florida PIP claims as of July 1, 2012, allows insurers to limit payment according to a schedule of charges. See Fla. Stat. §627.736(5)(a)(5). Emergency service providers are entitled to, “the usual and customary charges in the community for emergency services and care… which are provided by medical doctors, osteopathic physicians, allopathic physicians, and dentists in hospitals.” Thus, MDs, DOs, APs, and dentists in the emergency department of hospitals are entitled to 80% of the usual and customary charges in the community for emergency services. Usual and customary refers to what the providers historically charge. The proper payment would be 80% of the usual and customary charges by emergency providers in the same geographic location (i.e. by zip code, by county).

The problem lies in the insurance companies treating emergency physicians as hospitals. Insurers argue that emergency providers are providing emergency services and care and this type of care is actually provided by a hospital. However, emergency providers are absolutely not “hospitals” and are generally separate entities contracting with hospitals to provide this important treatment and care.

Emergency providers are being reimbursed with the incorrect payment methodology, namely, 75% of their usual and customary charges. This imbalance has caused emergency service providers to lose out on hundreds of thousands, and possibly even millions of dollars throughout the years. Insurance companies pay and move on while our providers suffer. Although emergency physicians treat patients in the hospital, most physicians are independent contractors and are not employed by the hospitals. Thus, they should not be treated as if they were rendering treatment for emergency services and care provided by a hospital. The proper classification would be emergency services and care provided by medical doctors, osteopathic physicians, allopathic physicians, and dentists in hospitals, rather than “for or by” a hospital.

WHAT LABOVICK LAW GROUP OFFERS

LaBovick Law Group has experienced attorneys, legal staff members, and a business liaison who work to collect reimbursements for our providers on a daily basis. Emergency service providers are absolutely entitled to the disparity between what the insurance companies have paid them and what payments are mandated by them. We know that our emergency providers are integral physicians in the medical field and we strive to right the wrongs and injustices committed by insurance companies each and every day.  We have the capability of performing a historical file review to capture exactly what patient files are ripe for a PIP suit due to the insurance company’s failure to pay 80% of the charges. We offer our file review/auditing process for free! We have specialized calculators and fee schedules to properly ascertain what reimbursement was proper for an individual policy.

If you or your company has been incorrectly paid 75% of their charges instead of the correct reimbursement equaling 80% of your charges, call LaBovick Law Group immediately to discuss what we can collect for you!

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.