The PIP Deductible Battle Continues in the Supreme Court

What Is Sarcoidosis | SSD Benefits Lawyer | LaBovick Law Group

On March 14, 2018, the Fourth District Court of Appeals muddied the waters with regard to the issue of the PIP deductible. Specifically, the 4th DCA ruled against the medical providers’ theory regarding the application of the PIP deductible. Why does this muddy the waters? The Fifth District Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the medical providers on the exact issue. We have a conflict between our distinguished judges in our district courts. This battle has waged on for the past few years. Unfortunately, it will continue until the Supreme Court ultimately reaches a final decision.

What Happened?

The Medical Providers in Florida argued that an insured’s PIP deductible should be applied to the total amount billed by the doctor/physician/medical professional. The insurance carrier believes that the PIP deductible should be applied after fee schedule reductions. Initially, the county courts were split as to which theory is correct.

The 5th DCA which includes parts of Orlando, Brevard, etc. accepted the first appeal concerning the competing PIP deductible theories. The 5th DCA ruled that the provider’s application was reasonable and made sense based on the Florida PIP statute/case law. Thus, we thought the issue was resolved. However, the 5th DCA on re-hearing agreed that the Supreme Court should hear the issue due to the great public importance at hand.

Where Is the Case Currently Situated?

The Supreme Court ultimately agreed to accept the jurisdiction of the 5th DCA deductible application case(s). The 4th DCA is merely a hurdle in the path of a final resolution. The Supreme Court will look at the 5th DCA opinion. The Supreme Court will allow the respective attorneys to brief their respective PIP deductible memorandums of law. We’ll finally get a binding decision that will impact the entire State of Florida.

The parties involved in the Supreme Court cases have dispensed with oral arguments. Thus, we expect an expedited decision from the Supreme Court. We do not anticipate another Allstate fiasco.

What Should You Do?

At this point, the most prudent thing to do is take inventory of your PIP deductible files. We do not need to file any cases at this point in time. Most insurers are awaiting a decision from the Supreme Court. These PIP insurance companies would like to be told what to do from the highest court in Florida. However, please still send those files our way. It’s quite possible to find an ancillary issue in addition to the PIP deductible being applied to the bills. Subsequent dates of service may be underpaid/not paid at all due to other frivolous defenses.

Do not hesitate to contact us to discuss the state of the PIP union. The deductible issue is far from settled. Two of our highly respected District Courts of Appeals disagreed as to the proper method of applying the PIP deductible. The Supreme Court will likewise have a difficult time settling this issue once and for all. We’ll provide everyone with updates as soon as we receive word of a decision.

As South Florida’s preferred PIP attorneys,  LaBovick Law Group& Diaz strives to keep our clients apprised of any and all issues affecting their medical practices.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.