Can You Sue Someone for Rear Ending You?

Read-End Accidents | Florida Rear-End Collision Settlement | LaBovick Law Group of West Palm Beach, Florida

Rear-end accidents are among the most common type of road collisions. They make up more than a quarter of car accidents. Suing someone over a rear-end collision depends on a number of factors. It’s not necessarily a done deal, and Florida’s rear-ends collision settlement numbers aren’t all the same.

Florida is a no-fault state. This means when you file a claim for a rear-end accident, there’s no need to prove the other driver is at fault. You can collect damage recovery regardless. This protects the driver who is at fault but also makes collecting damages from insurance companies easier and faster.

It doesn’t matter who’s at fault when it comes to your Florida personal injuries. Your insurer covers these regardless.

Financial Compensation

This means that in many rear-end accidents, your vehicle’s insurance policy is your primary source of financial recovery. The insurance company will still need to investigate to verify vehicle damage, property damage, and personal injuries.

It’s harder to sue in a no-fault state simply because many of the issues you would sue over are simplified. The burden is placed on insurance companies to follow through on elements of insurance coverage.

Where you would sue is if there was property damage that wasn’t addressed by insurance, for example, if you missed work or your injuries resulted in additional medical costs. Extensive property damage, lost income, or medical bills that go uncovered all fall under the category of tangible losses. That means you can measure them with a monetary amount. These are also known as economic damages.

You can also sue for intangible losses. This includes pain and suffering and reduced quality of life. If the result of the accident had a heavy emotional or physical toll on your well-being, these would count as intangible losses. These are non-economic because they can’t be measured directly with a monetary amount. A lawsuit involving them would still name an amount, however.

Proving Emotional Toll

Tangible losses are easier to prove than intangible losses because they come with a bill. They’ve already been assessed by a third party. A court may choose to include or throw out certain economic factors, but you’ll always be able to calculate what that means.

Intangible losses include an impact on your day-to-day life that is difficult to measure. The court will only choose in your favor if you can do a capable job of proving these. That can include an extended recovery time, changes in life as a result of the accident, loss of ability, pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of opportunity, just to name a few. The more you can prove these, the more successful a suit including intangible losses can be.

Cases that don’t involve injury may see a few thousand dollars in compensation but are generally not very large. Cases that do involve injury tend to see much larger amounts in compensation, whether through rulings or settlements. Neither is guaranteed. Just like anything in court, they both need to be supported through evidence. That evidence includes documentation usually supporting both tangible and intangible losses that reinforce each other.

Documentation

Not all documentation is financial. You may have kept notes of your recovery yourself. You may have evidence of both extended physical and psychiatric therapy. A relationship with a loved one may have worsened. You may have lost a job, been denied a promotion, or been passed over for consideration for a job elsewhere due to your injury. You may face a disability as a result of the accident.

Only claim what you can document and prove. Distress and anguish are real, but if you come to court without evidencing them then the court can’t assess them. It’s the court’s job to make an assessment of financial compensation based on the evidence it can see. Facing such things is difficult, which is why a professional is needed for any lawsuit involving a vehicle accident. A personal injury lawyer can guide you through all the necessities, and ensure that your case is strong and your struggle is properly evidenced.

Free Accident Case Evaluation

Understand that many rear-end accidents that result in a court case may be settled out of court. The value of a Florida rear-end collision settlement will vary depending on circumstances. Settlements are only taken when they’re a very good option; they’re often an indicator that someone doesn’t want to go to continue with a court case because they think they’ll lose. Your lawyer will ensure that you have a strong advantage in any settlement and that you only accept what is beneficial to you.

Let a Lawyer Assess Your Case

You really don’t know how strong your case is without meeting with a lawyer who specializes in traffic collisions, including rear-end accidents. It may be stronger than you think or it may need an element of documentation that hadn’t occurred to you yet. Every case is different.

The LaBovick Law Group has decades of experience when it comes to assessing the strength and monetary value of rear-end accident lawsuits. We will help you evaluate your case and calculate your damages in an accurate way. This gives you a much better picture of what your lawsuit may be worth and what still needs to be done to evidence it in court. Contact us today.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.