Can Social Media Affect Your Personal Injury Claim?

Social Media Rules | Personal Injury News | LaBovick Law Group

Personal Injury News Flash

Everyone uses social media. It certainly seems like that anyway! As we navigate social media rules that continuously evolve, those involved in personal injury claims face a more complicated situation: how much do you share, if anything, about your accident or incident? How can what you post on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, or other platforms impact your case? Let’s find out from the perspective of a personal injury lawyer.

Social Media Can and Will Be Used Against You in a Court of Law

In 2000, 18-year-old Fotini Kourtesis was driving to work when she was rear-ended. Ms. Kourtesis sued the other driver, claiming she suffered chronic pain and a loss of enjoyment in life. She said she could not dance or wrestle with her brother as she used to.

Choosing a Personal Injury Lawyer | Free Checklist | LaBovick Law Group& Diaz Facebook, though, told a different story. The court viewed photos of Ms. Kourtesis being lifted into the air by her brother and dancing. She claimed that the pictures were carefully posed, but the judge saw them as evidence that she enjoyed life. “Even if posed, the photographs were taken in an active social setting.”

Did the Facebook posts indicate that Ms. Kourtesis actually enjoyed life? Maybe not. We all know that people tend to emphasize (or exaggerate) the positive: they feel great; their relationships are awesome; their children are terrific; their last vacation was amazing. But did Ms. Kourtesis’s posts sway the judge in her case? Certainly.

When it comes to a personal injury claim, your social sharing can have significant ramifications. How can you protect yourself — and your case?

5 Social Media Rules

1. Cease social media activity. If you can, suspend your social media activity in the aftermath of an injury and while you are pursuing a claim. Some cases have shown that judges and juries can be influenced by friends posting “Happy Birthday” messages on plaintiffs’ timelines and by plaintiffs using a few smiley face emojis.

If you are claiming an injury has led to the loss of enjoyment of life, depression, or isolation, some parties may see these innocuous — unrelated — posts as “evidence.”

If you want to/must keep using social media:

2. Rethink “privacy.” You may think, “Well, my social media profiles are private. No one can see them if they aren’t my friends or followers.” This isn’t strictly true. If a friend tags you in a photo, for instance, it can allow access by third parties. If a defendant’s attorney and/or insurance company can see a post in which you are tagged or with which you have engaged, they are perfectly within the rule of law to use it against you. They can also request your social media activity during the discovery process or with a court order.

3. Be careful about your posts and updates. Social media is just that… social. Many of us want to share our experiences, positive and negative, with our friends and family. This is especially true when you need more support following an injury. However, if you are pursuing a personal injury claim, do not talk about your injuries, treatments, or physical condition. At all.

Even seemingly irrelevant posts and comments can be taken out of context; they can be used against you by the defendant’s attorney and/or insurance company. Do not take this risk: update trusted friends and family members in person.

4. Don’t talk about physical activities or travel on social media. Your activity can be used as evidence. Even if you are in pain, smiling at a ski resort in front of a mountain backdrop or watching your friends at the beach can be considered “proof” that you are not physically injured, depressed, anxious, or isolated.

Again, this may not be an accurate representation of reality: no one sees you collapsing after posing for the picture, retiring to your room early because you can’t physically or mentally handle the activity, or that this was a “good day” in a stretch of “hard days.”

5. Ask family members and friends to be careful with their posts. Again, your social media presence can be reflected in the activity of your connections. Request that they not tag you in posts and photos and that they do not mention your personal injury claim in any way.

Don’t Find Out the Hard Way

Patrick Snay found this out the hard way.

Claim for Personal Injury | Auto Accident Injury Claim | LaBovick Law Group& Diaz The head of a prep school sued for age discrimination when his contract was not renewed. Snay and the Gulliver Preparatory School agreed to a settlement ($10,000 in back pay, $80,000 in damages, and $60,000 for attorneys’ fees).

But then Snay’s daughter posted on Facebook: “Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver. Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT.” With 1200 followers, it didn’t take long for her words to reach school officials.

Gulliver’s attorneys claimed that Snay broke a confidentiality agreement barring him from discussing the case with anyone but his legal advisors and that he should not receive the settlement. The court sided with Gulliver, and the Snays were out $80,000 — and a European vacation.

It is best to refrain from posting to social media at all while you are pursuing a claim. Is it fair for defendants, attorneys, insurance companies, and the courts to use this as evidence against you? Perhaps not. Is it the reality in which we are now living? Yes.

The best way to protect yourself is to consult with an experienced personal injury attorney. Social media rules regarding your case can be difficult to understand or to accept. They can, however, have a major impact on your ability to pursue rightful compensation.

If you have been injured by another party’s negligence, carelessness, or recklessness, do not hesitate to contact LaBovick Law Group. We can advise you on all aspects of your case, including social media rules and best practices.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.