Social Security Disability Denial: Reconsideration Process, What You Need to Know

LaBovick Do I Need an Attorney to Apply for Social Security Disability

Unfortunately, social security disability denial is all too common after going through the application process and appearing before an administrative law judge. Although receiving a negative outcome is frustrating after waiting so long, hope is not lost. In fact, it’s not uncommon for those previously denied to eventually receive benefits. This article will explore the options available to you in the event of a social security disability denial.

Appealing a Social Security Disability Denial

First, if you are within 60 days of your hearing decision date, you do have the option to appeal the administrative law judge’s decision.

The instructions for submitting an appeal online are included with the judge’s Notice of Decision. If you choose to appeal the decision, the Appeals Council will review the entire file, including documents you completed for Social Security, medical records, earnings records, and the recording of the hearing.

The Appeals Council will determine whether the administrative law judge made a legal error when he or she decided on the case. If the Appeals Council finds that the judge did in fact make a legal error, they will send the case back for a new hearing with the same administrative law judge.

The Appeals Council will not reweigh the medical evidence; it will simply determine whether the judge did not properly follow one or more of Social Security’s regulations. Only about 20 percent of cases are sent back by the Appeals Council for a new hearing.

If the Appeals Council denies the appeal request, you have the option to file a federal court claim. The federal court will send the case back with instructions if they find that the judge and appeals council made a critical error in evaluating the case. There will then be a new hearing with the same administrative law judge.

Filing a New Claim for Social Security Disability Benefits

If you have missed the deadline to appeal, if your appeal was denied and you do not wish to go to federal court, or you simply do not want to proceed with appealing the judge’s decision, you may have the option to file a new claim for disability benefits.

One significant difference between filing an appeal and filing a new claim is that the date of disability, which Social Security calls the Alleged Onset Date, will need to change. This can affect the amount of past-due benefits you would be eligible to receive.

If you choose to file a new claim after a prior hearing decision, the earliest alleged onset date you will be able to choose is the day after the date of the administrative law judge’s unfavorable hearing decision. You will need to obtain new medical evidence to support your new claim.

This means that any medical records that were used to decide your previous unfavorable case will not be used to decide your new claim. Therefore, it is imperative if you choose to file a new claim that you continue to get updated treatment from your medical providers.

Even if your condition is considered to be permanent, it is important to continue to see a doctor so that his or her examination findings and comments regarding your long-term prognosis are documented clearly within your medical record.

What are the options to consider after social security disability denial: appealing or filing a new claim?

Appealing a Prior Hearing Decision

The advantage of appealing a prior hearing decision is that your original alleged onset date is preserved. This means that the medical records which were used in your initial hearing decision may be reevaluated if your case is sent back from the Appeals Council to the administrative law judge for a new judge. In addition, you maintain your original eligibility date for past-due benefits. Social Security will pay up to one year prior to the date that the claim was filed for SSDI benefits, depending upon the person’s alleged onset date. There is also a five month waiting period for benefits after the alleged onset date. By appealing the denial rather than filing a new claim, the person maintains eligibility for this higher level of past-due benefits.

Disadvantages of Appealing a Prior Hearing Decision

The Appeals Council typically only sends about 20 percent of cases back for a new hearing, and the judge may still deny the case at the new hearing. Typically, the same judge who presided over the first hearing will preside over the second one. If there are concerns about the particular judge and his or her overall approval ratings, it may be preferable to file a new application.

Filing a New Application for Benefits

If you choose to file a new application for benefits, it is important to confirm that your Date Last Insured is still current if you are filing a claim for SSDI benefits. In order to be eligible for SSDI benefits, you must prove you became disabled while you met “insured” status. Typically, one meets this requirement if they have worked and paid taxes on their earnings for at least five of the past 10 years. Therefore, if you have not worked for several years, it is important to check your date last insured. Social Security can provide you with this date either over the phone or by registering for their online portal.

Important Considerations When Filing a New Claim

The earliest alleged onset date you will be able to select is the date after your prior hearing decision, you will only be able to file a new claim if your date last insured has not expired.

Deciding whether to appeal a hearing decision or file a new claim can be difficult and warrants consultation with a skilled professional.

Seeking Legal Help

If you were denied at your previous hearing and your date last insured has not expired, do not give up hope – many people who were denied at their hearing go on to file a new application and be successfully approved for benefits. Our legal team at LaBovick Law Group has a wealth of experience with people in this exact situation. Give us a call at (561) 625-8400 for a free case evaluation.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.