Social Security Disability Reviews After Age 50: Your Comprehensive Guide

Social Security Disability Reviews After Age 50 | Experience Disability Attorney | LaBovick Law Group | Florida

Introduction

Embarking on the journey to secure social security disability benefits entails a meticulous understanding of the intricate process. In this all-encompassing guide, I delve into the multifaceted world of social security disability reviews after age 50. Leveraging my extensive expertise as a distinguished attorney with over two decades of experience in personal injury and social security cases, I am here to illuminate the complexities, ensuring you possess the knowledge needed to navigate the path with confidence.

Unraveling Complexity: A Holistic Exploration

The Odyssey of Patience: Embracing the Long Haul

Securing social security disability benefits is not a sprint, but rather a marathon that demands unwavering patience. The Social Security Administration (SSA) meticulously scrutinizes claims to ascertain their alignment with the statutory definition of disability. Given my seasoned background in the legal arena, I emphasize the paramount importance of recognizing the time investment this process necessitates. Perseverance and patience are key virtues as meticulous evaluations unfold to ensure that those genuinely deserving receive the vital assistance they require.

Social Security Disability Attorneys | RFC Assessment | LaBovick Law Group& Diaz

Debunking Myths: The Intricacies of Proving Disability

Dispelling misconceptions is paramount. Contrary to popular belief, contributing to insurance coverage through taxes does not automatically translate to entitlement to benefits. Establishing disability is a multifaceted endeavor, demanding adherence to the exacting standards set by the SSA. The fallacy that a mere belief in one’s inability to work due to disability will suffice must be eradicated. Instead, the SSA employs a rigorous assessment process to ensure benefits are granted only to those who genuinely meet the criteria.

Age as a Catalyst: Streamlining Eligibility

Ironically, age emerges as a pivotal factor in benefit acquisition. The SSA’s disability regulations become progressively accommodating once individuals cross the threshold of 50 years. This adjustment recognizes the inherent challenges associated with retraining individuals as they mature. To attain a comprehensive grasp of the SSA’s approach to social security disability review after age 50, it’s imperative to delve into the nuanced particulars.

The Golden 50s: What Changes in SSD Assessments?

Once you reach the age of 50, the SSA’s assessment paradigm undergoes a notable transformation.

  • GRID rules introduction: These consider age, education, work experience, and Residual Functional Capacity.
  • Retraining & Employment: Even if sedentary work is possible, the challenges of retraining and job placements grow.

The Shift at 55: A More Lenient Stance

The SSA’s evaluation criteria become even more understanding when one turns 55.

  • Adaptability: A recognition of decreased flexibility to new roles and reduced adaptability to new skills or job training.
  • Job Suitability: If restricted to light work and past jobs are infeasible, other available jobs may still qualify you for benefits.

The Senior Spectrum: Evaluating Disabilities after 60

The later stages of one’s career and health see a decrease in the frequency of CDRs. However, vigilance in documentation remains paramount.

  • Frequency: Rare CDRs, given that medical improvement likelihood drops.
  • Documentation: Ensure consistent and up-to-date medical records.

A Word of Caution: Early Retirement at 62 vs. Disability

Choosing early retirement over disability benefits at age 62 might seem tempting, but it comes with financial implications.

  • Early Retirement: Opting in will permanently reduce your monthly benefits.
  • Disability Continuation: Retain disability till full retirement age, resulting in a seamless transition to retirement benefits but at a more favorable monthly rate.

Deciphering the Five-Step Methodology

Free SSD Case Evaluation | LaBovick Law Group& Diaz

Step 1: Appraising Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA)

The expedition toward determining disability eligibility commences with an examination of substantial gainful activity (SGA). To qualify, one must demonstrate an inability to engage in SGA. SGA, a monthly income threshold established by the SSA, undergoes annual adjustments. In the year 2018, this threshold stood at $1,180. It’s pivotal to note that this figure represents gross income before taxes. If monthly earnings fall below $1,180 or if one is not employed, step two of the evaluation process is triggered.

Step 2: Evaluating Severity of Physical and/or Mental Conditions

The second step entails an exhaustive assessment of the severity of physical and/or mental conditions. Mere nominal impact on work capacity will not suffice; a profound impact is the imperative benchmark. The challenge here lies in establishing how a medical condition substantially impairs work capacity. Crafting a compelling connection between the medical condition and its pronounced impact on work capacity is indispensable at this stage.

Step 3: Meeting or Aligning with SSA Listings

Step three revolves around aligning with or satisfying the SSA’s meticulously crafted listings of medical conditions. These listings encompass conditions so severe that they inherently function as barriers to employment. Fulfilling these listings necessitates providing potent medical evidence. The exhaustive compilation of SSA listings is accessible at SSA Listings. If one’s condition does not align with these listings, the focus shifts to scrutinizing residual functional capacity (RFC).

Step 4: Scrutinizing Residual Functional Capacity (RFC)

Residual functional capacity (RFC) encapsulates an individual’s maximum physical and mental capabilities despite the presence of a medical condition. The process involves a meticulous perusal of medical records encompassing conditions, treatment, symptoms, and limitations. The objective is to ascertain the functional capacity, both physical and mental, that an individual can realistically exhibit. This information serves as the cornerstone for assessing when limitations render an individual incapable of engaging in their past relevant work, thereby concluding step four.

Step 5: Navigating the Labyrinth of GRID Rules

Step five demands substantiating that a medical condition hampers engagement in work within the national economy. However, individuals aged 50 and above are subject to the medical-vocational guidelines (GRID rules). This intricate framework is replete with exceptions. Broadly speaking, individuals aged 50 to 54 possessing a sedentary RFC that renders past work impossible could potentially qualify for disability benefits. This intriguing dynamic implies that even in the presence of jobs available at the sit-down level, eligibility for benefits may still apply. This unique perspective stems from the SSA’s acknowledgment that retraining for such positions becomes increasingly formidable after crossing the age of 50. Notably, if an individual’s past work entailed sedentary tasks and they can still perform them, the GRID rules may not grant disability benefits. (For those finding this perplexing, seeking guidance from an experienced social security disability attorney is highly recommended.)

The Brightening Horizon with Advancing Age

As one ages, the regulatory framework becomes increasingly accommodating. For individuals aged 55 to 59, a limited RFC—encompassing capacities like lifting, standing, and walking—can potentially trigger disability benefits, contingent on the impracticality of returning to past work. This acknowledgment underscores the unique challenges older individuals face in reentering the workforce or adapting to new roles. It also reflects the SSA’s sensitivity to the evolving needs of the aging population.

Conclusion

In the realm of social security disability review after age 50, knowledge emerges as the beacon of empowerment. This meticulously crafted guide delves into the stages, considerations, and advantages that shape your pursuit of benefits. As you navigate this intricate journey, remember that the counsel of seasoned attorneys can substantially bolster your prospects. At LaBovick Law Group, we offer extensive expertise and unwavering commitment to your success. If age intersects with your work capacity, reach out to us at (561) 623-3681 for a consultation. The time has come to secure the benefits rightfully yours.

Frequently Asked Questions

How pivotal is age in social security disability reviews?

Age assumes a pivotal role, significantly easing eligibility criteria, especially for those aged 50, 55, and beyond. This recognition stems from the understanding that career transitions become progressively intricate with advancing age.

Can I work while being eligible for disability benefits?

Eligibility can coexist with part-time work, provided earnings remain below the substantial gainful activity (SGA) threshold. This flexibility allows individuals to supplement their income without jeopardizing their benefit eligibility.

What encompasses residual functional capacity (RFC)?

RFC encapsulates the pinnacle of an individual’s physical and mental capabilities despite a medical condition. This assessment plays a pivotal role in determining the individual’s ability to engage in substantial gainful activity (SGA).

How does an experienced attorney enhance the process?

A skilled social security disability attorney offers invaluable guidance, unraveling the intricate regulations and optimizing your prospects of success. Their expertise ensures you present a compelling case highlighting the significant impact of your medical condition on work capacity.

When does social security disability cease reviewing cases?

Social security disability reviews extend well into later years, with criteria evolving based on age and circumstances. Consult a seasoned attorney to comprehend when these reviews undergo changes and how they may impact your benefit status.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.