The New Workers’ Compensation Revolution: CASTELLANOS V. NEXT DOOR

Castellanos v. Next Door Company was a monumental decision in many ways.  Employees injured at work face an uphill battle. Insurance carriers have a slew of defenses at their disposal. The Workers’ Compensation insurer can utilize these defenses to delay authorizing medical treatment and lost wages on behalf of the injured worker.  Thus, an injured worker is faced with a choice.

  1. The Injured worker can fight on his/her own, “pro se”, and attempt to navigate through a complicated legal system on his/her own OR
  2. The injured worker has the right to hire an attorney to represent his/her rights under the Workers’ Compensation system and expedite the provision of medical and lost wage benefits. The Supreme Court in Castellanos truly understood this dilemma.  However, this was solely the first “threshold” issue. The main issue had to do with the way a Workers’ Compensation attorney was paid under the statute. The Legislature changed the statute in 2009 and created a presumption that the Florida Workers’ Compensation statute (law) was reasonable. They did away with any mention of reasonable fees. Effectively, here’s what the old law did:
    1. Statutory Fees are the only fees permissible under the Workers’ Compensation law in Florida.
    2. Claimants cannot choose to pay their attorney an hourly fee for legal services rendered.
    3. Claimants cannot enter into retainer agreements for any dollar amount other than the fee schedule contained in the law.

Why was the statutory fee schedule a problem?

The Castellanos case is the best example of why the old fee schedule presumption was such an issue and prevented Claimants’ access to court/attorneys. Mr. Castellanos’ attorney worked 107.20 hours in attempting to secure necessary medical treatment, lost wages, etc. to ensure he was victorious in his workers’ compensation claim.  His attorney-drafted motions, filed documents/pleadings, attended hearings, mediations, and the like.  However, he was entitled to merely $1.53 per hour, yes you read that right, $1.53 per hour for his work due to the statutory fee schedule.  He received a whopping $164.01 for 107.20 hours of legal work!

This award was ridiculously low and would deter attorneys from 1. practicing workers’ compensation law and 2. representing injured workers in workers’ compensation cases in the future. Something had to be done.  The workers’ compensation law has become a very difficult system to navigate.  The Workers’ Compensation law is complex and very different from a typical personal injury case.  The law requires a legal expert who is well versed in all matters related to workers’ compensation.

Supreme Court says no more fee caps

The Supreme Court in Castellanos ruled the statutory fee schedule presumption to be unconstitutional.  The court further explained that the Workers’ Compensation system was set up for the injured workers’ benefit. The system’s goals are to, “provide the quick and efficient delivery of disability and medical benefits to an injured worker.” Section 440.015 Fla. Stat (2009).  Attorney intervention is necessary to ensure the quick delivery of medical and lost wage benefits.  An attorney cannot file Petitions, draft pleadings and attend hearings without a reasonable fee to ensure the injured worker receives the best work product possible.

The Court held the fee cap to be unconstitutional and the Claimant should have the opportunity to present evidence that the fee schedule does not provide for a reasonable attorney’s fee.  This gives the attorney an opportunity to utilize all legal resources at their disposal. The Employer/Carrier’s game is to delay benefits and maximize their client’s bottom line.  However, this decision strikes a new and fair balance.  Attorneys for the injured workers’ will now be able to file multiple Petitions for Benefits, represent their clients at all legal hearings and file the necessary pleadings to defeat the employer/carrier’s defenses.  The injured worker does not have to worry about finding an advocate who will work for $1.00 an hour due to an arbitrary and archaic interpretation of attorney’s fees.

Where do we go from here?

The Castellanos decision finally places the onus on the employer/carrier to stop their delays.  It likewise provides the employee with:

  1. Legal Representation of their choosing — No longer does an injured worker have to scramble to find an attorney willing to work for an attorney’s fee set at a figure which is below minimum wage.
  2. A Zealous Advocate — One who need not worry about maximizing his/her client’s case because case costs would outweigh the attorney’s fee award.
  3. Gives the Claimant an opportunity to present evidence that the attorney’s fee agreed upon is reasonable.

Here’s what the law after Castellanos becomes:

  1. We start at the statutory fee schedule-20/15/10
  2. The Injured worker HAS THE RIGHT TO PRESENT evidence that the statutory fee schedule is unreasonable, and that the agreed-upon fee or hourly fee presented is reasonable.
  3. No longer can the fee schedule be the sole determinant of what is ultimately paid to the attorney for attorney’s fees.
  4. The injured worker will have access to courts and counsel. Attorneys will take the complex, novel and difficult cases because of this monumental and historic ruling. The playing field is finally evened out.

Legislature reaction

In 2009 the Supreme Court ruled that a reasonable fee should be paid in Workers’ Compensation cases (found that the statute was ambiguous-Emma Murray). However, the Legislature amended the statute after that case was decided by deleting the confusing portion of the statute. The fee schedule was once again the law.  However, after the Castellanos decision, I don’t foresee the Legislature attempting to reset the law back to 20/15/10, in terms of attorney’s fees.  I do believe the Legislature will define what a reasonable attorney’s fee is beyond the judicial factors cited by case law.  It may be that a 25% or 30% fee cap may become the norm, similar to a personal injury case.

What we can do for you

LaBovick Law Group has a team of experienced Workers’ Compensation law attorneys who will fight for your rights under the Workers’ Compensation system. Our team will ensure you receive all benefits due and owing without unnecessary delay. Call us now to discuss your case! (561) 623-3681.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.