What Are Judges Doing About State Farm’s Unlawful PIP Policy?

New PIP Statute, New State Farm Shenanigans

Back to 2012-2013. The PIP law is now amended. State Farm changed their policy to include fee schedule language. The language they thought would allow them to reduce medical provider’s charges to Medicare fee schedule and workers compensation fee schedule reimbursements. It was not until recently our Honorable Judges caught on that State Farm was once again perpetrating a fraud.  Once again, State Farm’s policy is in limbo as it should be!

What happened when the PIP law changed?

The PIP law WAS amended in parts of 2012 and 2013. The fee schedules were included in the new PIP amendments. Amendments allow the insurer to pay via the fee schedules as long as the language is included in their policy.

There are two methods an insurer may choose; However, The insurer is only entitled to choose one of the following:

  1. Reasonableness Method-An insurer must decide the reasonable charge to pay to the medical provider  by considering a slew of factors such as:
    1. Provider’s usual and customary charge
    2. Reimbursement levels in the community
    3. Federal/state medical fee schedules
  2. Fee Schedule Method- Insurers must include language stating they will pay pursuant to the fee schedules. Example: We will limit reimbursement to 80% of Medicare fee schedules.

Unlawful and confusing State Farm policy!

State Farm unlawfully amended its policy. Why was it unlawful? The policy includes both methods. Yes, State Farm included BOTH methods. An insurer must choose one method.  State Farm says they will pay pursuant to a reasonable amount. They likewise mention paying pursuant to the fee schedules.

STATE FARMS CANNOT DO THIS.

State Farm is obligated by the Florida PIP Law to choose one of the above methods. State Farm cannot unilaterally include both in their policy.  Is that not confusing? How can you expect to know if you’ve been paid correctly? It’s next to impossible. How can a provider expect to know if they’re being paid correctly? The insured likewise has no idea if the doctor is getting paid correctly. This creates ambiguity and confusion. It’s another attempt by State Farm to pull a fast one on THE INSURED, MEDICAL PROVIDER AND THE COURT.

Plaintiff attorneys are fighting back! Fortunately, at least 2 courts: Miami Dade County and Duval County have ruled against State Farm regarding their confusing and unlawful policies. These two Honorable Courts agreed the policy is vague, ambiguous, and provides no clarity as to which method is being chosen. We are currently awaiting guidance from Broward Courts and from a District Court if these cases are eventually appealed.

However, these cases are monumental in a few respects:

  1. Showing State Farm they cannot get away with their unlawful policies.
  2. Showing insurers we will fight the good fight.
  3. Setting precedent for fellow providers/insureds.
  4. Preventing other insurers from utilizing the same ambiguous and confusing language in their policies.
  5. Detracting State Farm from challenging medical providers billing.

State Farms’s old policies are just as egregious!

State Farm’s pre-2012 policies were just as unlawful. State Farm “alleged” they chose the reasonableness method. Their policy likewise contained the reasonableness method language. State Farm was mandated to look at various factors to decide what to pay you, the medical provider. But, they lied to the insureds. State Farm considered only one source per suit.

Whether it was Medicare fee schedule, workers compensation fee schedule, etc., State Farm solely chose one reimbursement without any other factors.  I have taken numerous depositions of claims adjusters from State Farm.  I can tell you first hand, the adjusters admit to solely considering 1 fee schedule in paying your bills.

THE IMPORTANCE OF FIGHTING THESE STATE FARM POLICIES

****AN INSURER MUST CHOOSE ONE OF THE 2 METHODS. THE POLICY MUST BE CLEAR AS TO WHICH REIMBURSEMENT IS CHOSEN. FAILURE TO BE CLEAR WILL RESULT IN YOU, THE PROVIDER, BEING REIMBURSED 80% OF YOUR TOTAL CHARGES******

You are most likely owed thousands of dollars in improper reimbursements! We can help you recoup.

Send your PIP to LaBovick Law Group

LaBovick Law Group is always out in front of the newest issues.  We have been challenging State Farm’s policies for years.   I have crafted specific discovery tailored around State Farm’s new and old policies. How can an insurer say one thing and do another?

An insurance contract is an essential document. An insurance contract contains all of the aspects of your agreement with that insurer. Imagine agreeing on a price to buy a house, signing a contract, and then being charged double. Essentially, State Farm is alleging it is paying you one way, and behind closed doors, the insurer is solely considering one factor and paying you another way.

We are ready to fight the battle with State Farm and the other insurers improperly reimbursing your bills. We ensure you spend the least amount of time dealing with the actual litigation issues.  Our goal is to get you reimbursement as soon as possible. We are not the firm to stretch out a case to garner more fees.

Fight State Farm and other insurers!

If you refuse to file PIP suits and file PIP claims, the insurers will win.  Insurance Companies strive to create headaches for everyone involved in the process; insureds, providers, etc. These large corporations hope you submit your bills and accept whatever you receive. However, these two cases prove that the judicial system and our PIP litigation services truly make a difference regarding your bottom line. Call us immediately to schedule a Free PIP AUDIT!

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.