What is a trial work period?

What is a trial work period?

Many people who have become disabled, or who are waiting for approval of Social Security Disability benefits, wonder how they will be able to pay bills and support themselves. Some individuals attempt to return to work, either while waiting for their claim to be approved, or after they have been approved for benefits. The good news is that Social Security does allow people to attempt to return to work and maintain eligibility for benefits for a certain period of time, so long as certain guidelines are followed.

It is first necessary to understand what Social Security Disability benefits are. Social Security Disability Insurance is a federally administered program, funded by payroll taxes. It is available to those who have worked and paid taxes on their earnings, and who are unable to continue working due to a medical condition that lasts or is expected to last for at least twelve months or result in death. To be eligible for Social Security Disability benefits, your work earnings must have been reduced to less than what Social Security refers to as “substantial gainful activity” levels due to your medical conditions after your date of the disability. “Substantial gainful activity” levels are determined by Social Security and updated on an annual basis. In 2022, the maximum that one can earn and remain under the substantial gainful activity threshold is $1350 per month. These earnings are gross earnings prior to deductions and net take-home pay. If you attempt to return to work with earnings over the substantial gainful activity amount after your date of disability but have to stop working within 6 months of starting due to your medical conditions, this will be considered an unsuccessful work attempt. However, there should typically be a period of about 12 months between your date of disability and the date that you attempted to return to work. This is because Social Security’s definition of “disability” is a condition that has lasted or is expected to last for at least 12 months that keeps you from working. Therefore, if you have returned to work within the 12 month period, Social Security will likely find that you do not meet their definition of disabled.

If you are attempting to return to work, Social Security allows you to test your ability to rejoin the workforce and remain eligible for benefits for a period of time. This is referred to as a “trial work period.” If you are receiving benefits, you will continue to receive benefits during the trial work period regardless of how much you earn. Social Security does not consider work activities that are performed during the trial work period as showing that the disability has ended until the services have been performed for at least 9 months within a rolling 60 month period. The 9 months of service do not have to be performed consecutively. Social Security defines “services” as any activity which is done in employment for pay or for-profit or is the kind which is normally done for pay or for profit. Your trial work period starts when you begin working and performing “services” with earnings over the trial work period amounts designated by Social Security. The trial work period amounts differ from the substantial gainful activity amounts; they are also updated on an annual basis but are much lower. In 2022, the trial work period amount is $970 per month. Again, these are gross earnings. Social Security will deduct the amount that you need to spend on impairment-related expenses when determining whether your earnings meet this threshold. For example, if you need to spend money on specialized work-related equipment or assistive devices in order to perform your job, those expenses will be deducted from the trial work period earnings in determining your eligibility. Your trial work period cannot begin until the first month when you become entitled to disability benefits, or the month when you filed for disability benefits, whichever is later. Note as well that Social Security can terminate your benefits before the trial work period has ended if it determines that your medical condition has improved and that you no longer meet Social Security’s definition of “disabled.” Therefore, it is important to continue to receive treatment for your conditions, even after your benefits have been approved.

If you have returned to work and are still waiting for approval, it is possible for Social Security to approve your disability benefits yet state that you are within a trial work period. This often happens when people who are applying for benefits have reached the hearing stage, which often happens nearly two years after the date they filed for benefits. If you have been approved for benefits but the administrative law judge states that you are within a trial work period, it is important to note that your reason for stopping working after approval needs to be related to your medical condition or any treatment that you are receiving as a result of your condition. In the alternative, if you are able to continue working and have not yet been approved for benefits, you may want to opt for a closed period of benefits, which is the period of time between when you became disabled and when you were able to return to work.

Navigating Social Security’s rules related to going back to work while disabled can be very challenging. It is best to obtain representation from an experienced Social Security Disability attorney. Your attorney and legal team will represent you through the application, reconsideration, and hearing phases of the disability benefits process and provide guidance as to the best steps to take to ensure your claim is successful. Fighting for approval for Social Security Disability benefits is a very lengthy, slow-moving process, and receiving professional help relieves some of the burdens of this often very stressful endeavor. Call LaBovick Law Group at (561) 625-8400 for a free case evaluation and to get your Social Security Disability application started.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.