What role does the vocational expert play in my Social Security disability hearing?

What role does the vocational expert play in my Social Security disability hearing?

Often, people who are applying for Social Security disability benefits who attend a hearing with an Administrate Law Judge express that the most confusing part of the hearing is understanding the testimony of the vocational expert. To better understand the role of the vocational expert in a hearing, it helps to have an understanding of Social Security’s disability evaluation process.

Social Security Disability insurance benefits are available to those who have worked and paid taxes on their income and are unable to continue normal work activities due to a medical condition that has lasted or is expected to last for at least six months or result in death. The first step to obtaining benefits is to submit an initial application. If the initial application is denied, the next step is to submit a reconsideration appealing the initial decision. If the reconsideration is denied, the next step is to request a hearing with an Administrative Law Judge.

At the administrative hearing, you will testify by answering questions about your work history and your medical conditions, including your abilities to perform activities such as sitting, standing, walking, and lifting or carrying weight if your medical conditions are physical in nature. You will also testify regarding your ability to complete your activities of daily living such as bathing and dressing, taking care of household chores, driving, and grocery shopping.

The vocational expert then testifies at the next part of the hearing. A vocational expert is a vocational professional who is hired by the Social Security Administration to provide impartial expert opinion testimony about a person’s vocational abilities. The vocational expert is required to have up-to-date knowledge of, as well as current experience with, industrial and occupational trends. He or she is also required to have knowledge of vocational counseling and job placement of adults with disabilities into jobs.

The Judge will ask the vocational expert to classify your past work. The vocational expert will review the work history report which you have previously submitted, which should outline your job duties including the heaviest amount that you were required to lift or carry, whether you supervised other people, whether you used any special machines or tools, and how many hours of the day you spent sitting and standing. This is also information that you will provide when testifying about your work history at the hearing. The vocational expert will be asked by the Judge to classify your “past relevant work.” This is work that you have done within the past fifteen years at substantial gainful activity levels which you performed long enough to learn. The vocational expert will refer to the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, which is a source of occupational information provided by the Department of Labor. The Dictionary of Occupational Titles provides information about jobs in the national economy and lists the skill level and exertional level of each job. The Dictionary of Occupational Titles provides a reference number for each listed job, known as the DOT number. The vocational expert will provide the DOT number for each job that you have previously performed when he or she testifies at the hearing.

After the vocational expert provides testimony regarding your past work, the Administrative Law Judge will describe hypothetical individuals with certain limitations and abilities. These can be physical limitations, such as being able to stand and sit a certain number of hours in an 8-hour workday, lift and carry various amounts of weight at varying frequencies; or mental limitations, such as limitations in abilities to interact with the public, coworkers, and supervisors. The vocational expert will testify whether the hypothetical person could return to his or her past work. If the person is not able to return to past work, the vocational expert will then advise if there are any jobs which this hypothetical individual can perform that exist in significant numbers in the national economy. If the vocational expert finds jobs that exist, he or she will provide information regarding these jobs from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, as well as the number of these jobs that exist in the national economy. The Judge may provide several different hypotheticals to the vocational expert with varying limitations. The vocational expert may also be asked to testify regarding the acceptable number of times per month that a person can be absent from work, as well as the acceptable amount of time that a person is permitted to be “off task” in the workplace. This testimony can be very important when you are receiving ongoing treatment for a condition that would cause excessive absences from work, such as infusion treatments or physical therapy. The vocational expert can also provide testimony regarding the transferability of job skills. Transferability of skills is a factor that comes into play when the person was age 50 or older on the date of the disability.

Hiring an attorney to represent you at the hearing phase is crucial for your success. Your attorney will be able to question the vocational expert and propose her own hypotheticals after the judge has finished questioning the vocational expert. An experienced Social Security Disability attorney is familiar with the resources with which a vocational expert consults when providing his or her testimony. Your attorney will accordingly be able to question the vocational expert regarding any damaging testimony that he or she provides. Although you are not required to have representation at your hearing, you are entitled to have a representative present if you choose to have one. Your chances of succeeding at your hearing improve when you retain an attorney to represent you. Social Security’s regulations surrounding disability are complex and not necessarily intuitive. It is best to hire an attorney who understands how to win your case within the framework of these rules.

The Social Security Disability Attorneys at LaBovick Law Group are passionate about fighting to win for our clients at all stages, including during the hearing phase. Give our team a call at (561) 625-8400 for a free case evaluation.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.