Will I be able to get social security disability benefits even if I have a drug or alcohol abuse problem?

If you are worried that your use of drugs or alcohol will affect your ability to win your Social Security disability case, you will want to read this.

First, let’s start by defining our terms. The Social Security Administration, (“SSA”), refers to this as drug and alcohol abuse. (“DDA”).  DDA refers to substance use disorders as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association.  (“DSM”). Substance use disorders are diagnosed in part by the presence of abusive use of alcohol, illegal drugs, prescription medications and toxic substances.

Per the DSM, substance use disorders involve: taking a substance in larger amounts or for a longer period of time than you are supposed to; not managing to cut down or stop using even though you want to; spending a lot of time getting, using or recovering from use of the substance: cravings and urges to use the substance; not managing to do what you should in life because of the substance use; continuing to use the substance even when it causes problems in relationships; giving up important social, occupational or recreational activities because of substance use; using substances repeatedly even when it puts you in danger; continuing to use even when you know you have a physical or psychological problem that could have been caused or made worse by the substance; needing more of a substance to get the effect you want; developing withdrawal symptoms which can be relieved by taking more of the substance. The severity of the substance use disorder depends on how many symptoms are identified. According to SSA, a specific medical diagnosis of substance abuse disorder is not required if there is sufficient medical evidence of drug or alcohol use in the record.

SSA looks for evidence regarding the existence of DAA in the form of treatment for a substance use disorder, or evidence of emergency department admissions due to substance abuse. There must be objective medical evidence, such as signs, symptoms, laboratory findings from an acceptable medical source to support a finding of DAA.  Evidence that simply shows that a claimant uses drugs or alcohol is not by itself sufficient to establish the existence of a substance use disorder. For example, self-reported drug or alcohol use, an arrest for driving under the Influence, or a third-party report, would not be sufficient evidence of DAA alone.

In order to prove disability and be entitled to Social Security Disability Benefits, you must meet the definition of “disability” under the SSA’s rules and regulations. There is a five-step process or analysis that the SSA uses to evaluate each claim and determine if you are disabled.  In general, to meet the definition of disability you must be unable to engage in the substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.

SSA looks at whether DAA is a contributing factor that is material (or a key factor) to the determination of disability.   What does it mean to be “material” to the determination of disability?  If you would still meet SSA’s definition of disability even if you stop using drugs or alcohol then DAA is not material; and you will be found disabled.  In other words, if a claimant would not be disabled absent his alcoholism, alcoholism is a contributing factor material to the finding of disability, and benefits would be denied.  Once a claimant shows that he or she would still be found disabled even if drug or alcohol use stopped; the focus turns to whether the remaining impairments are disabling.

When does SSA determine whether DAA is material or not?  This determination will only be made if there is medical evidence from an acceptable medical source establishing that a claimant has a substance use disorder and you are disabled considering all impairments, including DAA.  This determination does not get made if there is a history of DAA not relevant to the period of disability under consideration. You, as the claimant, have the burden of proving disability. Therefore, you have the burden of establishing that you would still be disabled even if you were not using drugs or alcohol.   SSA will look at how the DAA causes or affects your other medically determinable impairments, and see if the other impairments are disabling by themselves.   If your other physical or mental impairments are sufficiently severe to establish disability by themselves, (in other words they prevent basic work activities), then you will be found disabled.

It can be difficult to prove the disabling effects of other impairments in the absence of DAA, since the record, as it exists, includes the DAA.  SSA may consider medical opinions about the effects of the remaining medical conditions and their limitations in absence of DAA. SSA also has to consider whether if the DAA is removed, the remaining impairments would improve to the point that there may no longer be a disability.  DAA can cause or exacerbate the effects of physical impairments.  Usually, the best evidence for determining whether a physical impairment would improve to the point of no disability is to look at a period of abstinence from DAA.  The period of abstinence should be long enough to allow the acute effects of drug or alcohol use to abate. If the other impairments are mental disorders, it should be documented what medical findings and impairment-related limitations remain after the DAA is removed.

The period for which you are claiming disability should not start until the earliest date on which the evidence shows that you became disabled due to a medically determinable impairment and that DAA was not material.

If you believe that you have mental and or physical impairments that are preventing you from working, applying for social security disability is likely the right choice for you.  The existence of an alcohol or drug use disorder on top of your physical and or mental impairments presents an added challenge and complexity to your claim that will need to be addressed.  At the LaBovick Law Group, we provide free consultations where we will review the facts of your case to determine if this is the right program for you.  Call us today at (561) 623-3681 for your free evaluation.

It’s easy to get started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

It’s Easy to Get Started

Fill out the form or call us at 561-888-8888

Meet your legal team

We fight to win you more

Premises liability

PREMISE LIABILITY

$450,000

James was searching for equipment for painting at Home Depot. In the aisle next to him, there was a worker on a lift stocking the highest shelf. The worker pushed boxes so far across the shelf that they fell off the other edge and hit James in the head. The force almost knocked James unconscious. He sat down and the loud bang got the worker off the ladder to see what fell. When they saw James they offered him a bucket and made a report. James did not recall leaving the store or how he got home. He did not recall much except being at home depot and getting hit in the head. Home Depot told him that it was a small box of dust masks that hurt him. We discovered it was actually a large box of emergency kits that fell off the shelf.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$850,000

In this case, our client slipped and fell on water that had accumulated near the hot tubs/showers on the Lido deck of a major cruise line ship. The client suffered torn ligaments to her shoulder that required 2 arthroscopic surgeries. The cruise line took the position that the condition on the floor was open and obvious.

Premises liability

PREMISES LIABILITY

$980,000

Georgia was visiting a friend in the hospital when she walked out of the elevator and into her friend’s room. As soon as she entered the room she slipped on a newly mopped floor without any wet floor sign present. The floor was so wet that Georgia’s entire outfit was soaked. Because of the muted tile floor, the water was invisible. Georgia needed a back operation which was unsuccessful and caused her to slip into a coma. She luckily survived.

Motor vehicle accident

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

$1.1 MILLION

AUTOMOBILE REAR END COLLISION

Rodrigo was driving his work truck home when he was rear-ended at a stoplight. Rodrigo needed a fusion of his thoracic spine. A terrible and complex operation. Unfortunately, while Rodrigo was undergoing the spinal operation, one of his children died and he was unable to be with his grieving wife. It was a tragic case that eventually settled.

Bicycle vs car accident

BICYCLE VS CAR ACCIDENT

$1.45 MILLION

David was a teacher at a local high school. He rode his bike to school in the morning and after school would ride another 10 miles for exercise. On a sunny afternoon on his way home an older driver turned right into him as he was riding down the street. He hurt his shoulder and neck and needed two operations. Defendant felt his injury was due to playing football 10 years earlier and would not provide him a fair or reasonable offer.

Car vs commercial truck accident

CAR VS COMMERCIAL TRUCK ACCIDENT

$3.4 MILLION

Joe was driving his 18 wheeler on the Florida Turnpike headed south after a long-haul run.  He was “bobtailing” which means he did not have a cargo trailer on the back of his truck rig.  A drunk driver lost control of his car causing Joe to avoid the accident but drive off the highway and into a canal.  He was injured in the accident but also witnessed a child die when he climbed out of the truck and came to the accident site.  There the injured child was trapped under the car and he was powerless to save the child before it passed.

Auto accident T-Bone

AUTO ACCIDENT T-BONE

$4.5 MILLION

Xao, a Vietnamese immigrant was driving home after work at night to see his pregnant wife. He stopped at a 4-way intersection and looked both ways. He did not see anyone in either direction. As Mr. X when through the intersection he was hit on the passenger side door by a mid-sized black SUV driving without their lights on. Mr. X was catastrophically injured.

Personal injury

PERSONAL INJURY

$8.2 MILLION

This was a hard-fought pedestrian accident case, in which our client was struck by an SUV driven by a teen driver, as they attempted to cross North Military Trail in West Palm Beach, FL. As a result of the accident, our client suffered numerous fractures, partial loss of vision and frontal lobe brain injury that affected his speech, and other personal injuries that required him to be hospitalized for 58 days.

At the time of the accident, our client was a cashier at Walmart and has been unable to return to work.

“This case is the epitome of what we consider part of our Core Culture and broad vision – which is to be Warriors for Justice,” stated Brian LaBovick. “Mr. Jacobus has serious permanent injuries and will continue to fight to regain his life into the foreseeable future. This verdict will allow him to get the professional help he needs to safely navigate the rest of his life.”

Medical malpractice

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

$15 MILLION

Brain damages child due to medical negligence.  Mother was misdiagnosed upon entry to the hospital while under contractions.  The child was born severely disabled.